Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Influence of Public Engagement with Science on Scientific Information Literacy During the Covid‐19 Pandemic

Empirical Evidence from College Students in China

Bibliographic Data

ID21585601
AuthorsChao Gu (0009-0008-9016-3060, Peking University), Yi Feng (0000-0003-0001-6857, Central University of Finance and Economics, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume31
Issue3
Pages619-633
Publication date2022-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueScience & Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0926-7220 • E-ISSN: 1573-1901
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11191-021-00261-8
PMID34483484
OpenAlexW3197329681
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited40

During the COVID-19 pandemic, we are fighting not only the novel coronavirus, but also the “infodemic” induced by the pandemic. Therefore, it is urgent to explore approaches for enhancing individual immunity against science-related misinformation. We conducted a cross-sectional study to examine the relationship between public engagement with science (PES) and scientific information literacy (SIL) during the COVID-19 pandemic from college students ( N = 8075) in China. The results showed that there was a significant difference between attitudes toward and activities of PES. More importantly, both PES activities and PES attitudes were found positively associated with SIL, especially the PES attitudes. The empirical study is significant in demonstrating the predictive effect of PES on individual ability to recognize science-related misinformation, which is crucial for mitigating harm from the “infodemic.” Our study indicated that other than a science communication model in order to restore public trust in science, PES is promising to be incorporated into informal science education to facilitate individual SIL

2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Information literacy · Literacy · Outbreak · Pandemic · Pedagogy · Political science · Public engagement · Public health · Public relations · Science education · Scientific Literacy · Sociology · Child Development and Digital Technology · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Medicine · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Nursing · Virology

  • Discovering temporal scientometric knowledge in Covid-19 scholarly production

    Open Access•Breno Santana Santos, Ivanovitch Silva et al.•Scientometrics•2022

  • Construction of an evaluation index system for teacher education students’ information literacy

    Open Access•Shi Chen, Sabariah Mohamed Salleh et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • The role of media professionals in perpetuating and disrupting stereotypes of women in Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) fields

    Open Access•Charisse L’Pree Corsbie-Massay, Charisse L'Pree Corsbie-Massay et al.•Frontiers in Communication•2022

  • Cyber anti-intellectualism and science communication during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Yan Kuang•Frontiers in Public Health•2025

  • The Influence of Public Engagement with Science on Trust in Science During the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Chao Gu, Yi Feng•SAGE Open•2025

  • Analysing pre-service elementary teachers’ scientific literacy through environmental issues

    Deniz Sarıbaş•International Journal of Science…•2025

  • Critical Rationalism and Trust in Science

    Open Access•Adam Chmielewski•Science & Education•2022

  • Enhancing scientific literacy in rural and urban schools through PDP-BL with STEAM

    Open Access•Frendi Ihwan Syamsudin, Sulistyo Saputro et al.•The Journal of Educational Research•2025

  • Revealing public attitudes toward mobile cabin hospitals during Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Shenghua Zhou, Hongyu Wang et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2024

  • Scientific Information Literacy

    Open Access•Han Wang, Lina Li et al.•Media and Communication•2023

  • Public collaboration to improve the future for science in Brazil

    Open Access•Lucas Rodriguez Forti, Judit K Szabo•Environmental Science & Policy•2024

  • Who should be a science communicator? The struggle for ‘legitimate’ status as science communicators between Chinese scientists and citizens on a Chinese knowledge-sharing platform

    Open Access•Zheng Yang•Public Understanding of Science•2023

  • Moral expression of “experts” and public engagement

    Open Access•Yipeng Xi, Weiyu Zhang•Public Understanding of Science•2025

  • Social media, misinformation, and age inequality in online political engagement

    Saifuddin Ahmed, Dani Madrid-Morales et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2022

  • Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen, Cohen Cohen et al.•Applied Multiple Regression/Correla…•2013

  • Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    Jacob Cohen, Patricia Cohen et al.•Applied Multiple Regression/Correla…•2014

  • Public Health and Online Misinformation

    Open Access•Briony Swire-Thompson, David Lazer•Annual Review of Public Health•2020

  • The Paradox of Participation Versus Misinformation

    Sebastián Valenzuela, Daniel Halpern et al.•Digital Journalism•2019

  • Developing a News Media Literacy Scale

    Open Access•Seth Ashley, Adam Maksl et al.•Journalism & Mass Communication…•2013

  • Model uncertainty, political contestation, and public trust in science

    Open Access•Sarah E Krep, Douglas L Kriner•Science Advances•2020

  • The State of Media Literacy

    W James Potter•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2010

  • News Media Literacy and Political Engagement

    Open Access•Seth Ashley, Adam Maksl et al.•Journal of Media Literacy Education•2017

  • Science communication as a preventative tool in the Covid19 pandemic

    Open Access•Gustavo Matta•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2020

  • Can science literacy help individuals identify misinformation in everyday life

    Open Access•Aviv J Sharon, Ayelet Baram-Tsabari•Science Education•2020

  • Science communication activism

    Open Access•Qiaoyan Zhu, M Horst•Public Understanding of Science•2019

  • Unbalanced progress

    Open Access•Hepeng Jia, Li Liu•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • Public participation in genomics research in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Anne M Dijkstra, Jan M Gutteling et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2012

  • Mapping science communication scholarship in China

    Open Access•Linjia Xu, Biaowen Huang et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2015

  • Why should we promote public engagement with science

    Open Access•Jack Stilgoe, Simon J Lock et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • The measurement of civic scientific literacy

    Open Access•Jon D Miller•Public Understanding of Science•1998

  • Inoculating Against Fake News About Covid-19

    Open Access•Sander Van Der Linden, Jon Roozenbeek et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2020

  • Politicization and Polarization in Covid-19 News Coverage

    Open Access•P Sol Hart, Sedona Chinn et al.•Science Communication•2020

  • Framing the Origins of Covid-19

    Open Access•Toby Bolsen, Risa Palm et al.•Science Communication•2020

  • What is scientific literacy

    Open Access•John Durant•European Review•1994

  • Assessing the risks of ‘infodemics’ in response to Covid-19 epidemics

    Open Access•Rosalia Gallotti, Francesco Valle et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2020

  • User Engagement in Public Discourse on Genetically Modified Organisms

    Open Access•Qian Xu, Nan Yu et al.•Science Communication•2018

  • What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda

    Open Access•Martin W Bauer, Nick Allum et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2007

  • Media Literacy and the Challenge of New Information and Communication Technologies

    Sonia Livingstone•The Communication Review•2004

  • Media Literacy as a Core Competency for Engaged Citizenship in Participatory Democracy

    Open Access•Paul Mihailidis, Benjamin Thevenin•American Behavioral Scientist•2013

  • Does Media Literacy Help Identification of Fake News? Information Literacy Helps, but Other Literacies Don't

    Open Access•M Jones-Jang, Tara Mortensen et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2021

Unique citing works14
Citations per year3.5
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 13

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae