Two Damascus Document Fragments and Mistaken Identities
The Mingling of Some Qumran Cave 4 and Cave 6 Fragments
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21586193 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Eibert Tigchelaar (0000-0001-9414-8871, KU Leuven Belgium Leuven, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 64-74 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-14 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dead Sea Discoveries (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0929-0761 • E-ISSN: 1568-5179 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/15685179-20201001 |
| OpenAlex | W3124501656 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 1 |
Two of the unidentified Cave 4 fragments preserving text of the Damascus Document which were mistakenly associated with 4Q269 should instead be assigned to 6Q15, since they join to 6Q15 fragment 1. This is the first case of a join between fragments claimed to have come from different caves. Also PAM 41.734 does not clearly distinguish between all Cave 4 and Cave 6 fragments
Algorithm · Archaeology · Biblical studies · Cave · Combinatorics · Dead Sea Scrolls · Hebrew Bible · Jewish studies · Judaism · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Computer Science · Historical and Linguistic Studies · Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies · History · Mathematics
| Highly cited | No |
|---|