Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Supporting student learning from diagnosing erroneous examples when contrasting them with worked examples in the physics classroom

Bibliographic Data

ID21589350
AuthorsRafi’ Safadi (0000-0002-0930-0224, Research Authority and Science Education Department, The Academic Arab College for Education in Israel —Haifa, Haifa, Israel, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume44
Issue2
Pages245-270
Publication date2022-01-22
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Science Education, Part B (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2154-8455 • E-ISSN: 2154-8463
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09500693.2021.2023834
OpenAlexW4206445264
LanguageEN
Citations received5
References cited33

Troubleshooting activities require students to diagnose teacher-crafted erroneous examples by detecting and explaining the conceptual errors driving them. In a previous study, the author tested whether diagnosing erroneous examples and then scoring them using a rubric that contained the related worked examples, a step-by-step strategy to solve a problem, would help 8th graders studying simple electric circuits detect and learn from the conceptual errors in the erroneous examples. The findings showed that this graded activity was more effective than the traditional activity with the same worked examples but without rubrics. To determine whether older students with greater metacognitive skills still need the support provided by the graded activity, five 10th grade advanced physics classes completed a pretest/intervention/posttest after finishing a unit on geometric optics. Students in each class were randomly assigned to the graded (69 students) or the traditional activity (73 students). Students assigned to the graded activity detected and learned more from the conceptual errors in the erroneous examples than students administered the traditional activity. Thus, the findings of the current and the previous studies suggest the greater effectiveness of the graded activity as compared to the traditional activity, regardless of the students’ level of metacognitive awareness or topic

Cognition · Concept learning · Conceptual change · Mathematics education · Metacognition · Physics Education · Rubric · Science education · Teaching method · Troubleshooting · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy · Student Assessment and Feedback · Artificial Intelligence

  • Investigating students’ awareness of their own and others’ deviations from controlled science experiments

    Open Access•Linda Hämmerle, Andrea Möller et al.•International Journal of Science…•2026

  • A Framework for Learning From Erroneous Examples and Meta-Analysis of Empirical Research

    Open Access•Ecenaz Alemdag, Anja Eichelmann et al.•Review of Educational Research•2025

  • Learning from erroneous examples in the mathematics classroom

    Open Access•Rafi’ Safadi, Nadera Hawa•Instructional Science•2024

  • Making the productive failure in PS-I more productive

    Open Access•Rafi’ Safadi, Ali Diab•Instructional Science•2026

  • Learning from errors and failure in educational contexts

    Open Access•Susanne Narci, Ecenaz Alemdag•British Journal of Educational…•2025

  • Towards a Theory of When and How Problem Solving Followed by Instruction Supports Learning

    Open Access•Katharina Loibl, Ido Roll et al.•Educational Psychology Review•2017

  • Schema induction and analogical transfer

    Open Access•Mary L Gick, Keith J Holyoak•Cognitive Psychology•1983

  • Self‐Explanations

    Open Access•Michelene T H Chi, Michelene T H et al.•Cognitive Science•1989

  • Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques

    Open Access•John Dunlosky, Katherine A Rawson et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2013

  • Developing the theory of formative assessment

    Open Access•Paul Black, Dylan Wiliam•Educational Assessment,…•2009

  • The use of scoring rubrics for formative assessment purposes revisited

    Ernesto Panadero, Anders Jönsson•Educational Research Review•2013

  • Arguing to Learn in Science

    Open Access•Jonathan Osborne•Science•2010

  • Designing for Productive Failure

    Manu Kapur, Katerine Bielaczyc•Journal of the Learning Sciences•2012

  • The development of metacognitive ability in adolescence

    Open Access•Leonora G Weil, Susan M Fleming et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2013

  • Assessment as a tool for learning

    Open Access•Filip Dochy, Filip J R C Dochy et al.•Studies In Educational Evaluation•1997

  • Does peer assessment promote student learning? A meta-analysis

    Hongli Li, Yao Xiong et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2020

  • The assessment cycle

    Daniel L Reinholz, Daniel Reinholz•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2016

  • The zone of proximal development

    Open Access•J V Wertsch•New Directions for Child and…•1984

  • Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities

    Open Access•Keith J Topping, Keith Topping•Review of Educational Research•1998

Unique citing works5
Citations per year2,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae