Retention of acquired argumentation skills and nature of science conceptions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21589428 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rola Khishfe (0000-0002-3302-0783, American University of Beirut, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue | 13 |
| Pages | 2181-2204 |
| Publication date | 2020-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Science Education, Part B (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2154-8455 • E-ISSN: 2154-8463 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09500693.2020.1814444 |
| OpenAlex | W3084497623 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 46 |
The study aimed to investigate the retention of acquired argumentation and NOS conceptions among grade 10 students three months after the treatment. Thirty-six grade 10 students in two intact sections, randomly assigned into the Treatment and Comparison groups, participated in the study. The participants engaged in a treatment that lasted for four months and involved two units. Participants in both groups were involved in explicit argumentation instruction. However, participants in the Treatment group received the additional explicit NOS instruction. To assess the learning and retention of participants' argumentation skills and NOS conceptions, all participants responded to two open-ended questionnaires three times during the study (pre-, post-, and delayed post-test) followed by individual semi-structured interviews. Results showed that participants of the Comparison group, who engaged in explicit argumentation instruction only, mostly did not retain their argumentation skills, three months after the treatment. While participants of the treatment group, who engaged in explicit argumentation and explicit NOS instruction, mostly retained their argumentation skills and NOS conceptions after a three-month period following the treatment. These findings were discussed in terms of the following premises: prolonged contact with the content, distributed multiple experiences, meaningful cognitive connections, and NOS as a metacognitive tool
Argumentation theory · Cognition · Epistemology · Mathematics education · Metacognition · Pedagogy · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Psychology · Science Education and Pedagogy
Acquisition and Retention of Nature of Science Understandings
Moderating effects of teacher feedback on the associations among inquiry-based science practices and students’ science-related attitudes and beliefs
Nature of Science in Science Educational Videos
Improving Students’ Conceptions of Nature of Science
Connected learning
Educational psychology
Nature of Science, Scientific Inquiry, and Socio-Scientific Issues Arising from Genetics
Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy
A learning progression for scientific argumentation
Argument‐Driven Inquiry as a way to help students learn how to participate in scientific argumentation and craft written arguments
Enhancing the quality of argumentation in school science
Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science
Improving science teachers' conceptions of nature of science
Views of nature of science questionnaire
Arguing to Learn in Science
What “ideas‐about‐science” should be taught in school science? A Delphi study of the expert community
Influence of explicit and reflective versus implicit inquiry‐oriented instruction on sixth graders' views of nature of science
Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education
Rote Versus Meaningful Learning
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |