Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The complexity of neural responses to visual stimuli

On Carruthers’ challenge to Block’s overflow argument

Bibliographic Data

ID21591773
AuthorsDamiano La Manna (0000-0003-2385-1935, Department of Philosophy, Damiano La Manna Is at University of Sheffield, UK, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume34
Issue2
Pages233-253
Publication date2021-02-17
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophical Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0951-5089 • E-ISSN: 1465-394X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09515089.2020.1862781
OpenAlexW3117018889
LanguageEN
References cited27

Ned Block’s overflow argument purports to establish that the neural basis of phenomenal consciousness is independent of the neural basis of access consciousness. In a recent paper, Block’s argument has been challenged by Peter Carruthers. Carruthers concedes the truth of one of the argument’s key steps, namely, that phenomenal consciousness overflows what is in working memory. At the same time, he rejects the conclusion of the argument by developing an account of this overflow that is alternative to Block’s. In this paper, I argue that Carruthers’ account does not pose a real threat to the overflow argument. The overall plausibility of Carruthers’ account rests on the empirical plausibility of a claim concerning global broadcasting which, albeit intuitively plausible in light of a lightly-sketched picture of the impact of attention upon neural matters, he offers no sufficient empirical evidence for. Drawing on some important imaging studies that reveal striking facts about neural responses to visual stimuli, I argue for two intimately related claims: first, that the intuitive plausibility of claims like Carruthers’ is not a guarantee of empirical plausibility; second, that as concers the same claims, strong empirical evidence is needed before confident judgments of empirical plausibility can reasonably be formulated

Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Consciousness · Empirical evidence · Empirical research · Epistemology · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Neural dynamics and brain function · Philosophy · Psychology · Visual perception and processing mechanisms

  • The Conscious Brain

    Jesse Prinz, Jesse J Prinz•Conscious Brain•2012

  • The magical number 4 in short-term memory

    Open Access•Nelson Cowan•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2001

  • The distinct modes of vision offered by feedforward and recurrent processing

    Open Access•Victor A F Lamme, Pieter R Roelfsema•Trends in Neurosciences•2000

  • Consciousness cannot be separated from function

    Open Access•Michael A Cohen, Daniel C Dennett•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2011

  • On a confusion about a function of consciousness

    Open Access•Ned Block•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•1995

  • The information available in brief visual presentations.

    George Sperling•The Psychological Monographs•1960

  • Towards a cognitive neuroscience of consciousness

    Open Access•Stanislas Dehaene•Cognition•2001

  • Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing

    Open Access•Stanislas Dehaene, Jean-Pierre Changeux et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2006

  • Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience

    Open Access•Ned Block•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2007

  • The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions

    Open Access•Steven J Luck, Edward K Vogel•Nature•1997

  • Working Memory, Thought, and Action

    Alan Baddeley•WORKING MEMORY, THOUGHT, AND…•2007

  • In Praise of Poise

    Daniel Stoljar•Blockheads!•2019

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae