Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Further exploration of anti-realist intuitions about aesthetic judgment

Bibliographic Data

ID21592222
AuthorsJames Andow (0000-0002-5760-0475, University of East Anglia, corresponding author)
Year2022
Volume35
Issue5
Pages621-661
Publication date2022-07-04
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePhilosophical Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0951-5089 • E-ISSN: 1465-394X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09515089.2021.2014440
OpenAlexW4200555295
LanguageEN
References cited30

Experimental philosophy of aesthetics has explored to what extent ordinary people are committed to aesthetic realism. Extant work has focused on attitudes to normativism -a key commitment of realist positions in aesthetics -the claim that aesthetic judgments/statements have correctness conditions, invariant between subjects, such that there is a fact of the matter in cases of aesthetic disagreement. The emerging picture is that ordinary people strongly and almost universally reject normativism and thus there is no strong realist tendency in ordinary people's thinking about the aesthetic. This has been taken to dissolve the traditional puzzle in aesthetics of how to best account for the fact that (a) aesthetic judgments seem intersubjectively valid, while (b) aesthetic experience seems subjective. This paper presents studies which further enrich our understanding of ordinary thinking about the aesthetic: ordinary thinking about the aesthetic may not be so vehement in its rejection of normativism; and where previous results suggested that, in many cultures, the dominant trend is to reject correctness conditions for aesthetic judgments, the current results suggest participants think aesthetic judgments have correctness conditions (albeit perhaps very finely relativized to specific circumstances of judgment)

Aesthetic experience · Aesthetics · Cognitive psychology · Correctness · Epistemology · Extant taxon · Realism · Aesthetic Perception and Analysis · Computer Science · Ethics, Aesthetics, and Art · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • The psychology of meta-ethics

    Open Access•Geoffrey P Goodwin, John M Darley•Cognition•2008

  • How Big is a Big Odds Ratio? Interpreting the Magnitudes of Odds Ratios in Epidemiological Studies

    Henian Chen, Patricia Cohen et al.•Communications in Statistics -…•2010

  • Folk Moral Relativism

    Open Access•Hagop Sarkissian, John Park et al.•Mind & Language•2011

  • Moral Objectivism in Cross-Cultural Perspective

    James R Beebe, Runya Qiaoan et al.•Journal of Cognition and Culture•2015

  • Relationalism about perceptible properties and the principle of charity

    Open Access•Pendaran Roberts, Kelly Ann Schmidtke•Synthese•2016

  • Faultless Disagreement and Aesthetic Realism

    Open Access•Kevin Schäfer, Karl Schafer•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2010

  • Intention, Supervenience, and Aesthetic Realism

    E Marcia Muelder•The British Journal of Aesthetics•1998

  • Empirically Investigating Imaginative Resistance

    Y Liao, Shen‐yi Liao et al.•The British Journal of Aesthetics•2014

  • Experimental Philosophy of Aesthetics

    Open Access•Florian Cova, Amanda Núñez García et al.•Philosophy Compass•2015

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae