Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Meaning-Making at the ECJ and the ECtHR

A Comparative Legal-Linguistic Analysis of Autonomous Concepts

Bibliographic Data

ID21593396
AuthorsGreta Spanò (European University Institute, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume39
Issue5
Pages1525-1547
Publication date2026-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0952-8059 • E-ISSN: 1572-8722
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s11196-025-10398-2
OpenAlexW4416843696
LanguageEN
References cited25

This paper investigates how the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) and the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) interpret autonomous concepts. Autonomous concepts are the product of a peculiar interpretative technique employed by the CJEU and ECtHR in order to harmonise legal language within a multilingual and multicultural legal space. To do so, these courts define and interpret a new terminology specifically for European Union law and the European Convention on Human Rights, declaring that they must be interpreted independently of any national or international meaning. The number of autonomous concepts, as well as the official languages, differ considerably between the two frames: the European Union counts 27 Member States and 24 official languages, while the Contracting Parties to the Convention are 46, with two official languages. Despite their differences, it appears that both courts employ this interpretative technique to solve the tension created by the various meanings that terms might have in domestic courts. To do so, they give new meaning to legal terms, thereby creating a detachment from the significance of national legal terms. This paper examines the case-law of both courts regarding the conceptual autonomy of legal terms and analyses their linguistic and argumentative patterns through the lens of corpus linguistic analysis

Argumentative · Autonomy · Convention · Economic Justice · European union · European Union law · Human rights · Terminology · Comparative and International Law Studies · Legal Language and Interpretation · linguistics and terminology studies

  • Corpus Linguistics at Work

    Elena Tognini-Bonelli•Corpus Linguistics at Work•2001

  • Jurilinguistique comparée

    Open Access•Heikki E S Mattila•International Journal for the…•2021

  • Linguistic Comparison within CJEU’s Decision-Making

    Open Access•Martina Bajčić•International Journal for the…•2021

  • Corpus Linguistics in Legal Discourse

    Open Access•Stanisław Goźdź-Roszkowski•International Journal for the…•2021

  • The Truth in Autonomous Concepts

    G Letsas•European Journal of International…•2004

  • Can Quantitative Methods Complement Doctrinal Legal Studies? Using Citation Network and Corpus Linguistic Analysis to Understand International Courts

    Open Access•Urška Šadl, Henrik Palmer Olsen•Leiden Journal of International Law•2017

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae