Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Validation of the communication skills scale among oncology physicians and nurses in Mexico

Bibliographic Data

ID21595752
AuthorsEduardo Amaranto Jiménez Padilla (0000-0002-3960-8641, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, corresponding author), Xolyanetzin Montero Pardo (0000-0003-3656-0942, Universidad Autónoma de Sinaloa), Oscar Vazquez (0000-0002-1325-8575, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología), Oscar Galindo Vázquez (Servicio de psicooncología, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, INCan), Erika Ruiz-García (0000-0002-0446-123X, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología), Patricia Ortega Andeane (0000-0003-2696-3166, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico), Tania Estapé (0000-0001-9792-2586, Fundación Chile), Rosa María Álvarez-Gómez (0000-0002-5458-7201, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología), Omar Saucedo Vigueras (0009-0007-2667-8150, Hospital de Especialidades), César Leal‐costa (0000-0002-7711-3877, Universidad de Murcia)
Year2026
Volume36
Issue1
Publication date2026-12-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCritical Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0958-1596 • E-ISSN: 1469-3682
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09581596.2026.2694882
OpenAlexW7167624249
LanguageEN
References cited51

Introduction Effective communication among physicians and nurses is associated with improved satisfaction and quality of care in oncology patients. Assessing these skills requires valid and reliable instruments capable of identifying areas for improvement.Objective To examine the factorial structure and psychometric properties of the Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale (EHC-PS) in a sample of Mexican oncology healthcare professionals.Method A cross-sectional comparative study was conducted with 320 healthcare professionals (117 nurses and 203 physicians) from two cancer care institutions using non-probabilistic convenience sampling. Participants completed a demographic questionnaire and the EHC-PS. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed on a subsample of 240 participants, while the full sample was used for comparative analyses. Robust estimation methods were applied to account for the ordinal nature of the data.Results The original four-factor model showed inadequate fit. A three-factor model demonstrated improved fit and parsimony (CFIrob = .927; TLIrob = .900; SRMR = .048), although RMSEA remained slightly above conventional thresholds (RMSEArob = .090). The final structure included empathy, informative communication, and respect, reflecting a data-driven reorganization in which items from the social skills factor were reassigned. No significant differences were found between physicians and nurses (p > .05), with small effect sizes.Discussion Findings provide preliminary evidence supporting a shortened three-factor version of the EHC-PS. Although psychometric properties were acceptable, results should be interpreted cautiously due to model modifications and lack of cross-validation. Further research is needed to confirm stability and generalizability

Confirmatory factor analysis · Health care · Health professionals · Psychometrics · Quality (philosophy) · Rating scale · Sample (material) · Scale (ratio) · Structural equation modeling · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Empathy and Medical Education · Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare

  • Oxford Textbook of Communication in Oncology and Palliative Care

    David W Kissane, Barry D Bultz et al.•Oxford Textbook of Communication…•2017

  • Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments

    Open Access•A Brett Hauber, Brett Hauber et al.•Value in Health•2016

  • The Mediation Myth

    Rex B Kline•Basic and Applied Social Psychology•2015

  • El análisis factorial exploratorio de los ítems

    Open Access•Susana Lloret-Segura, Adoración Ferreres-Traver et al.•Anales de Psicología•2014

  • When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions.

    Mijke Rhemtulla, Patricia E Brosseau-Liard et al.•Psychological Methods•2012

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data

    Open Access•Cheng-Hsien Li•Behavior Research Methods•2016

  • In Search of Golden Rules

    Herbert W Marsh, Kit-Tai Hau et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2004

  • Assessment of Interpersonal Communication Skills Among Sari Health Centers' Staff

    Open Access•Hasan Siamian, Masoumeh Bagheri‐Nesami et al.•Materia Socio Medica•2014

  • Psychometric Properties of the Health Professionals Communication Skills Scale in University Students of Health Sciences

    Open Access•Rocío Juliá‐sanchi, María José Cabañero‐Martínez et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Healthcare providers and patients

    Open Access•Claude Richard, Marie-Therese Lussier et al.•Medical Education Online•2023

  • Measurement invariance conventions and reporting

    Open Access•Diane L Putnick, Marc H Bornstein•Developmental Review•2016

  • From alpha to omega

    Open Access•Thomas J Dunn, Thom Baguley et al.•British Journal of Psychology•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae