Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mind the queue

Understanding challenges of introducing e-government policies for entrepreneurs during Covid-19 in a Latin American country

Bibliographic Data

ID21595949
AuthorsAllan Discua Cruz (0000-0002-0069-3092, Lancaster University), Jose Mario Reyes Hernandez (Honduras Foundation for Agricultural Research), Carlos Roberto Arias Arévalo (0000-0002-5833-0956, Seattle Pacific University)
Year2023
Volume36
Issue6
Pages2418-2439
Publication date2023-09-08
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInformation Technology and People (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0959-3845 • E-ISSN: 1758-5813
PublisherEmerald (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1108/itp-09-2021-0726
OpenAlexW4294626467
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited57

Purpose This study aims to focus on understanding the tensions experienced by government officials in introducing electronic government (e-government) policies to support entrepreneurs in a developing Latin American country. Design/methodology/approach This study relies on an in-depth qualitative approach based on collaborative and analytic auto-ethnography. The authors concentrate on tensions experienced by a government official and how they were addressed when introducing e-government policies to support entrepreneurs during the Covid-19 pandemic. Findings The findings reveal that paradoxical tensions occur as changes are demanded, multiple concerns are expressed and decisions about resources have to be made. The findings reveal sources of tensions from government, business and external sources. Addressing such tensions revolves around a diverse form of paradoxes dealing with contradictions in terms of speed vs thoroughness and short- vs long-term implications. Research limitations/implications The authors’ study provides several contributions. It advances understanding on the source and management of tensions experienced by government officials introducing e-government policies to support entrepreneurs during the Covid-19 pandemic. It also delineates multiple paradoxes experienced by government officials as new policies and systems were introduced. Finally, it offers a conceptual model explaining how government officials deal with multiple tensions emerging from the introduction of e-government policies in a developing country. Originality/value The prior literature has suggested that e-government initiatives would be guided by a prescriptive and tension-free process, driven by the interest to enhance governmental efficiency. This study reveals that developing e-government initiatives for entrepreneurs and existing businesses during the Covid-19 crisis was not immune to contradictions between government officials and the public. A conceptual model, based on multiple sources of tensions (government-related, business-related and external sources) and their management, is proposed. Implications and opportunities for further research are presented

Business · Originality · Political science · Public relations · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Computer Science · E-Government and Public Services · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Media and Politics

  • Decoding Paradoxes in Digital Government

    Open Access•Yifan Wang, Bing Ran et al.•Public Administration•2025

  • Citizens’ Attitudes Toward E-Government During the Covid-19 Pandemic

    Open Access•Jiřina Bokšová, Josef Horák et al.•Information Polity•2026

  • Effects of Covid-19 on business and research

    Open Access•Naveen Donthu, Anders Gustafsson•Journal of Business Research•2020

  • Toward a Theory of Paradox

    Wilson K Smith, Wendy K Smith et al.•Academy of Management Review•2011

  • Cognitive Frames in Corporate Sustainability

    Thomas Hahn, Tobias Hahn et al.•Academy of Management Review•2014

  • The utilization of e‐government services

    Open Access•Lemuria Carter, France Belanger•Information Systems Journal•2005

  • Alternative Perspectives in the Organizational Sciences

    Roger Evered, Meryl Reis Louis•Academy of Management Review•1981

  • Paradox Research in Management Science

    Jonathan Schad, M W Lewis et al.•Academy of Management Annals•2016

  • Acceptance of protection technology in a time of fear

    Open Access•Abdallah Alsaad, Manaf Al‐okaily•Information Technology and People•2022

  • Assessing the drivers of the regional digital divide and their impact on eGovernment services

    Open Access•Mónica Pazmiño-Sarango, Mijail Naranjo-Zolotov et al.•Information Technology and People•2022

  • Future of e-Government

    Open Access•Suresh Malodia, Amandeep Dhir et al.•Technological Forecasting and…•2021

  • The public value of E-Government – A literature review

    Open Access•Jean Damascene Twizeyimana, Annika Andersson•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • Collaborative autoethnography

    Open Access•Rituparna Roy, Shinya Uekusa•Qualitative Research Journal•2020

  • Collaborative Autoethnography as Multivocal, Relational, and Democratic Research

    Kathy-Ann C Hernandez, Heewon Chang et al.•a/b Auto/Biography Studies•2017

  • Analyzing e-government research

    Open Access•Richard Heeks, Savita Bailur•Government Information Quarterly•2006

  • E-government discourses

    Open Access•Mevlut Yildiz, Mete Yıldız et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2013

  • Understanding the e-government paradox

    Open Access•Alberto Savoldelli, Cristiano Codagnone et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2014

  • Analysing the scientific evolution of e-Government using a science mapping approach

    Open Access•Laura Alcaide Muñoz, Laura Alcaide–Muñoz et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2017

  • A public value perspective for ICT enabled public sector reforms

    Open Access•Antonio Cordella, Carla Bonina et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2012

  • The great theory hunt

    Open Access•Frank Bannister, Robert Connolly et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2015

  • Close encounters of the digital kind

    Open Access•Ida Lindgren, Christian Østergaard Madsen et al.•Government Information Quarterly•2019

  • The Myths of E-Government

    Victor Bekkers, Vincent Homburg•The Information Society•2007

  • Identity work by a non-white immigrant business scholar

    Open Access•Mario Fernando, James Reveley et al.•Human Relations•2020

  • Beyond Covid‐19

    Open Access•Arjen Boin, Kathy L Brock et al.•Canadian Public Administration•2020

  • Autoethnography

    Open Access•David Butz, Kathryn Besio•Geography Compass•2009

  • Conducting Qualitative Research to Respond to Covid-19 Challenges

    Open Access•Stéphanie Tremblay, Sonia Castiglione et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Ethics in Autoethnography and Collaborative Autoethnography

    Open Access•Judith C Lapadat•Qualitative Inquiry•2017

  • Performing Autoethnography

    Open Access•Tami Spry•Qualitative Inquiry•2001

  • Analytic Autoethnography

    Open Access•Léon Anderson•Journal of Contemporary Ethnography•2006

  • Impressions of Grandmother

    Open Access•Carol Rambo•Journal of Contemporary Ethnography•2005

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae