Personality in information systems professions
Identifying archetypal professions with suitable traits and candidates' ability to fake-good these traits
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21596128 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Luka Tomat (0000-0003-2063-1777, University of Ljubljana), Peter Trkman (0000-0002-1664-8026, University of Ljubljana), Anton Manfreda (0000-0003-0469-5201, University of Ljubljana, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 52-73 |
| Publication date | 2022-12-19 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Information Technology and People (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0959-3845 • E-ISSN: 1758-5813 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/itp-03-2021-0212 |
| OpenAlex | W3205061027 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 89 |
Purpose The importance of information systems (IS) professions is increasing. As personality–job fit theory claims, employees must have suitable personality traits for particular IS professions. However, candidates can try to fake-good on personality tests towards the desired personality type. Thus, the purpose of this study is to identify archetypal IS professions, their associated personality types and examine the reliability of the Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) personality test in IS recruitment decisions. Design/methodology/approach The authors reviewed academic literature related to IS professions to identify job archetypes and personality traits for IS professions. Then, the authors conducted an experiment with 452 participants to investigate whether candidates can fake-good on personality tests when being tested for a particular IS profession. Findings The identified job archetypes were IS project manager, IS marketing specialist, IS consultant, IS security specialist, data scientist and business process analyst. The experimental results show that the participants were not able to fake-good considerably regarding their personality traits for a particular archetype. Research limitations/implications The taxonomy of IS professions should be validated further. The experiment was executed in an educational organisation and not in a real-life environment. Actual work performance was not measured. Practical implications This study enables a better identification of suitable candidates for a particular IS profession. Personality tests are good indicators of the candidate's true personality type but must be properly interpreted. Originality/value This study enhances the existing body of knowledge on IS professions' archetypes, proposes suitable MBTI personality types for each profession and provides experimental support for the appropriateness of using personality tests to identify potentially suitable candidates
Archetype · Big Five personality traits · Creativity · Originality · Personality · Personality type · Applied Psychology · Employer Branding and e-HRM · Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development · Management and Marketing Education · Psychology · Social Psychology
Personality Trait Change in Adulthood
Personality and Performance at the Beginning of the New Millennium
Too much of a good thing
Personality and job performance
Technology readiness
Research Note —How Does Personality Matter? Relating the Five-Factor Model to Technology Acceptance and Use
Perspectives on Models of Job Performance
Reconsidering the Use of Personality Tests in Personnel Selection Contexts
Key competencies for big data analytics professions
The impact of information technology culture and personal innovativeness in information technology on digital entrepreneurship success
The effect of personality traits and knowledge on the quality of decisions in supply chains
Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator as a Tool for Leadership Development? Apply With Caution
Modeling Intraindividual Change in Personality Traits
Teacher's Myers-Briggs personality profiles
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
IT jobs
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |