Unpacking the sociomaterial parameters of connectivity management practices in the Saudi academic context
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21596390 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Njod Aljabr (0000-0001-5703-8171), Dimitra Petrakaki (0000-0003-2136-3858), Petros Chamakiotis (0000-0001-7109-310X) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-29 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Information Technology and People (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0959-3845 • E-ISSN: 1758-5813 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/itp-05-2023-0442 |
| OpenAlex | W4393273462 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 52 |
Purpose Existing research on how professionals manage after-hours connectivity to work has been dominated by studies on the strategies/practices individuals develop. In these studies, mobile technology is perceived as a tool or an enabler that supports otherwise human-centric connectivity decisions. This view sees technology as separate or external to the organisation, missing out on its nuanced role in shaping connectivity decisions. Our study aims to bring technology back into the sociomaterially imbricated context of connectivity and to unpack its parameters. Design/methodology/approach Drawing on data collected from documents and semi-structured interviews, we adopt the framework of “sociomaterial imbrications” (Leonardi, 2011) to understand the social and material parameters that influence connectivity management practices at two different academic institutions in Saudi Arabia. Findings The study identifies a set of social and material parameters (organisational, individual, technological and situational) that imbricate to shape, collectively and not individually, professionals’ connectivity management practices. Connectivity decisions to change practice (such as decisions of where, when or why to connect) or technology (how to connect) are not as distinct as they appear but originate from, and are founded on, imbricated sociomaterial parameters. Our study further suggests that connectivity decisions are shaped by individuals’ perceptions of sociomaterial imbrications, but decisions are not solely idiosyncratic. The context within which connectivity decisions are taken influences the type of decisions made. Originality/value Connectivity management emerged from sociomaterial imbrications within a context constitutive of four interacting parameters: organisational, technological, situational and individual. Decisions around the “how” and the “what” of connectivity – i.e. the practice of connectivity and its underpinning technology – originate from how people perceive sociomaterial imbrications as enabling or constraining within a context. Individual perceptions account for changes in practice and in technology, but the context they find themselves in is also important. For instance, we show that professionals may perceive a certain technology as affording, but eventually they may use another technology for communications due to social norms
Engineering ethics · Geography · Knowledge management · Sociology · Unpacking · Computer Science · Engineering · Information Systems Theories and Implementation · Innovation and Knowledge Management · Knowledge Management and Sharing · Philosophy
Sociomaterial Practices
The Autonomy Paradox
Employee engagement, human resource management practices and competitive advantage
Constant Connectivity
The Theory, Practice, and Evaluation of the Phenomenological Method as a Qualitative Research Procedure
Sociomaterial practices for value co-creation in the sharing economy
Worlds apart
The mobile technological era
After-hours work-related technology use and individuals' deviance
Personality differences as predictors of action-goal relationships in work-email activity
Boundary communication
Case study research
Theoretical foundations for the study of sociomateriality
Well-being and working from home during Covid-19
It is ok to be interrupted; it is my job” – perceptions on technology-mediated work-life boundary experiences; a sociomaterial analysis
Employee Engagement and Wellbeing in Times of Covid-19
From Work to Life and Back Again
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis
Why people engage in supplemental work
When work is wanted after hours
Online boundary work tactics
After‐hours connectivity management strategies in academic work
Performing projects with constant connectivity
The differential impact of ICT on employees
Embracing or embattled by converged mobile devices? Users’ experiences with a contemporary connectivity technology
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |