Early Arabic logicians on the contraposition of the particular affirmative
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21597680 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Asadollah Fallahi (0000-0002-1878-8866, Iranian Institute of Philosophy, Tehran, Iran, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 382-404 |
| Publication date | 2023-05-04 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal for the History of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0960-8788 • E-ISSN: 1469-3526 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09608788.2023.2168251 |
| OpenAlex | W4323268208 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
This paper is a narrative of the fate of I-contraposition in the early Arabic logic. I will study Avicenna’s, al-Suhrawardī’s, al-Rāzī’s, al-Kashshī’s, and al-Khūnajī’s views on this rule. Although Avicenna explicitly acknowledged I-contraposition in a brief note, and in an apparently Meinongian language, the other four figures found I-contraposition problematic and listed some counterexamples to it. Nonetheless, they all attempted to justify Avicenna’s acceptance of the rule by restricting its application conditions. These efforts led to interesting syntactic and semantic analyses but gathered little attention from later medieval logicians. Finally, in the middle Arabic logic, the revised versions of I-contraposition were also declared invalid
Acknowledgement · Arabic · Art · Eleventh · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Narrative · Proposition · Classics · Computer Science · Families in Therapy and Culture · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |