A hint as to my grounds for judgement
Frege’s positive account of modality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21597701 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Todd Sanders (0000-0002-0880-8843, University of Duisburg-Essen, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 885-910 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-04 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | British Journal for the History of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0960-8788 • E-ISSN: 1469-3526 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09608788.2024.2445597 |
| OpenAlex | W4407224371 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 30 |
Frege’s Begriffsschrift account of modality involves both a negative and a positive claim. The negative claim is that modal notions are logically insignificant; the positive claim is that modals convey a ‘hint’ (Wink) as to the speaker’s grounds for judgement. This paper is about Frege’s positive claim, which has not received much attention. I explain in detail the Fregean notion of hinting and how to distinguish hints from conceptual contents, and I argue that Frege’s two-dimensional account of modal talk is supported by various observations. However, it also seems clear that Frege’s account cannot be the whole story
Epistemology · Judgement · Classical Philosophy and Thought · Computer Science · Linguistics and Discourse Analysis · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Use-Conditional Meaning
The Myth of Conventional Implicature
Nonfactualism about Epistemic Modality
Epistemic Modals
Modality
Semantic Interpretation In Generative Grammar
Gottlob Frege Nachgelassene Schriften
The Routledge Handbook of Metaethics
Fregean Side-Thoughts
Frege
Meaning and Grammar
Assertion
Sinning Against Frege
Ascriptivism
Conventional implicature, presupposition, and the meaning of must
Two Misconstruals of Frege's Theory of Colouring
Epistemic modality and truth conditions
| Highly cited | No |
|---|