Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Later Mohist ethics and philosophical progress in ancient China

Bibliographic Data

ID21597745
AuthorsDaniel J Stephens (0000-0002-2577-4139, Philosophy, Duke Kunshan University, Kunshan, People’s Republic of China, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume29
Issue3
Pages394-414
Publication date2021-05-04
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0960-8788 • E-ISSN: 1469-3526
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09608788.2020.1816528
OpenAlexW3091773004
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited7

The writings of the later Mohists are generally taken to contain several updates to the consequentialist ethical view held by the Mohist school. In this paper, I defend one interpretation of those updates and how they may have served, within the Mohists’ argumentative context, to make their views more defensible. I argue that we should reject A.C. Graham’s prominent interpretation, on which the later Mohists’ argumentative strategy is to develop a conception of the a priori and to ground their ethical view in a form of a priori rationalism. I contend, instead, that the strength of the later Mohists’ ethical view comes largely from their adoption of a subjective criterion for identifying what counts as a benefit within their consequentialist view. I show how the adoption of this subjective criterion fits within a larger trend in later Mohist thought of coming to terms with the diversity of people’s evaluative standpoints, and further show how it equips the later Mohists with worthwhile responses to their philosophical rivals

A priori and a posteriori · Argumentative · China · Consequentialism · Epistemology · Mohism · Political science · Rationalism · Sociology · Anthropology · Chinese history and philosophy · History · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Law · Philosophy · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Are the later Mohists preference-satisfaction consequentialists? A discussion of Daniel Stephens’ “Later Mohist ethics and philosophical progress in ancient China”

    Bradford Jean‐Hyuk Kim•British Journal for the History…•2024

  • Later Mohist Logic, Ethics and Science

    Chad Hansen, A C Graham•Philosophy East and West•1981

  • An Approach to Verification beyond Tradition in Early Chinese Philosophy

    Anne D Birdwhistell•Philosophy East and West•1984

  • "A Critique of A. C. Graham's Reconstruction of the "Neo-Mohist Canons

    Jane M Geaney, Jane Geaney•Journal of the American Oriental…•1999

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae