Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Leibniz on free and responsible wrongdoing

Bibliographic Data

ID21597983
AuthorsJuan Garcia Torres (0000-0001-7514-6694, Wingate University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume31
Issue1
Pages23-43
Publication date2023-01-02
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueBritish Journal for the History of Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0960-8788 • E-ISSN: 1469-3526
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09608788.2022.2151410
OpenAlexW4311531343
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited15

According to intellectualists, the will is a rational inclination towards apprehended goodness. This conception of the will makes its acts intelligible: they are explained by (i) the nature of the will as a rational inclination, and (ii) the judgement of the intellect that moves the will. From this it follows that it is impossible for an agent to will evil as such or for its own sake. In explaining wrongdoing intellectualists cite cognitive error or the disruptive influences of the passions; these considerations, however, seem involuntary and at least partly exculpatory. The intellectualist needs an account that renders wrongful actions intelligible without undermining their status as responsible. I argue that Leibniz has the theoretical tools to provide at least part of an answer to this problem. In sum, an agent is directly responsible for her wrongdoing if the cognitive error or the disruptive influence of the passions that help explain this wrongdoing do not completely undermine her acting freely; an agent is indirectly responsible for her wrongdoing if she is directly responsible for previous actions which partly resulted in her wrongdoing, even if the presence of cognitive error or disruptive influence of the passions completely undermines her acting freely

Epistemology · Intellect · Judgement · Passions · Wrongdoing · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Free Will and Agency · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Jorge Portilla on philosophy and agential liberation

    Open Access•Juan Garcia Torres•The Southern Journal of Philosophy•2024

  • Thomas Aquinas on Moral Wrongdoing

    Open Access•Colleen Mccluskey•Thomas Aquinas on Moral Wrongdoing•2016

  • The Theory of Will in Classical Antiquity

    Albrecht Dihle•Theory of Will in Classical…•1982

  • Virtues of the Will

    Philip L Quinn, Bonnie Kent•The Journal of Philosophy•1996

  • Moral Necessity

    Robert Merrihew Adams•Leibniz•2005

  • Leibniz on Agential Contingency and Inclining but not Necessitating Reasons

    Open Access•Juan Garcia, Juan Garcia Torres•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • Who Discovered the Will

    T H Irwin, Terence Irwin•Philosophical Perspectives•1992

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae