Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

More Process, Less Principles

The Ethics of Deploying AI and Robotics in Medicine

Bibliographic Data

ID21598243
AuthorsAmitabha Palmer (0000-0001-6362-4935, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, corresponding author), David Schwan (0000-0002-7142-7293, Central Washington University)
Year2024
Volume33
Issue1
Pages121-134
Publication date2024-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0963-1801 • E-ISSN: 1469-2147
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0963180123000087
PMID37092348
OpenAlexW4366822056
LanguageEN
References cited26

Current national and international guidelines for the ethical design and development of artificial intelligence (AI) and robotics emphasize ethical theory. Various governing and advisory bodies have generated sets of broad ethical principles, which institutional decisionmakers are encouraged to apply to particular practical decisions. Although much of this literature examines the ethics of designing and developing AI and robotics, medical institutions typically must make purchase and deployment decisions about technologies that have already been designed and developed. The primary problem facing medical institutions is not one of ethical design but of ethical deployment. The purpose of this paper is to develop a practical model by which medical institutions may make ethical deployment decisions about ready-made advanced technologies. Our slogan is “more process, less principles.” Ethically sound decisionmaking requires that the process by which medical institutions make such decisions include participatory, deliberative, and conservative elements. We argue that our model preserves the strengths of existing frameworks, avoids their shortcomings, and delivers its own moral, practical, and epistemic advantages

Citizen journalism · Engineering ethics · Management science · Political science · Robot · Robotics · Slogan · Sociology · Software deployment · Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education · Computer Science · Engineering · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Artificial Intelligence

  • AI Ethics

    Mark Coeckelbergh•AI Ethics•2020

  • Value Sensitive Design

    Batya Friedman, David G Hendry•Value Sensitive Design•2019

  • Technology and the Virtues

    Shannon Vallor•Technology and the virtues•2016

  • Principles alone cannot guarantee ethical AI

    Open Access•Brent Mittelstadt•Nature Machine Intelligence•2019

  • In the hands of machines? The future of aged care

    Open Access•Robert Sparrow, Linda Sparrow•Minds and Machines•2006

  • Designing Robots for Care

    Open Access•Aimee van Wynsberghe•Science and Engineering Ethics•2013

  • Personal Robots, Appearance, and Human Good

    Open Access•Mark Coeckelbergh•International Journal of Social…•2009

  • Care robots and the future of ICT-mediated elderly care

    Open Access•Mark Coeckelbergh•AI & Society•2016

  • Alone together

    Damián Fernández Pedemonte•Choice Reviews Online•2011

  • How to practice person‐centred care

    Open Access•Maria J Santana, Maria Santana et al.•Health Expectations•2018

  • Granny and the robots

    Open Access•Amanda Sharkey, Noel Sharkey•Ethics and Information Technology•2010

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae