Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Neuroethics for Fantasyland or for the Clinic? The Limitations of Speculative Ethics

Bibliographic Data

ID21598403
AuthorsSven Ove Hansson (0000-0003-0071-3919), Oskar Hansson (0000-0001-8467-7286, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume29
Issue4
Pages630-641
Publication date2020-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0963-1801 • E-ISSN: 1469-2147
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0963180120000377
PMID32892771
OpenAlexW3083979709
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited32

What purpose can be served by empirically unsubstantiated speculation in ethics? In answering that question, we need to distinguish between the major branches of ethics. In foundational moral philosophy, the use of speculative examples is warranted to the extent that ethical principles and theories are assumed to be applicable even under the extreme circumstances referred to in these examples. Such an assumption is in need of justification, and it cannot just be taken for granted. In applied ethics, the use of unrealistic scenarios is more difficult to justify. It can be positively harmful if it diverts our attention from more urgent issues. Neuroethics is one of the areas of applied ethics where speculative scenarios have taken up much of the attention that could instead have been devoted to problems that are relevant for the treatment and care of patients. Speculative ethics has often been defended with mere possibility arguments that may at first hand seem difficult to refute. It is shown with examples how such claims can be defeated with a combination of science and argumentation analysis

Argumentation theory · Bioethics · Economics · Engineering ethics · Epistemology · Neuroethics · Political science · Psychiatry · Speculation · Engineering · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Ethics in medical practice · Law · Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Conceptualising and regulating all neural data from consumer-directed devices as medical data

    Open Access•Brad Partridge, Suzanne Dodd•Ethics and Information Technology•2023

  • The ethics of doing human enhancement ethics

    Open Access•Jon Rueda Etxeberria•Futures•2023

  • Hypothetical Cases and Abortion

    Don S Levi•Social Theory and Practice•1987

  • Bioethics, the Science of Survival

    Van Rensselaer Potter•Perspectives in biology and…•1970

  • Ethics, Speculation, and Values

    Open Access•Rebecca Roache•NanoEthics•2008

  • If and Then

    Open Access•Alfred Nordmann•NanoEthics•2007

  • Whereto speculative bioethics? Technological visions and future simulations in a science fictional culture

    Ari Schick•Medical Humanities•2016

  • Problems with precaution

    Kumanan Wilson, Katherine Atkinson et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2017

  • Philosophers and the Abortion Question

    Open Access•Philip Abbott•Political Theory•1978

  • Trusting blindly can be the biggest risk of all

    Open Access•Pru Hobson-West•Sociology of Health & Illness•2007

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,67
Citation span2023 - 2023 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae