Retrieving the Moral in the Ethics of Maternal-Fetal Surgery

Open-uterine surgery to repair spina bifida, or ‘fetal surgery of open neural tube defects,’ has generated questions throughout its history—and continues to do so in a variety of contexts. As clinical ethics consultants who worked (Mark J. Bliton) and trained (Virginia L. Bartlett) at Vanderbilt University—where the first successful cases of open-uterine repair of spina bifida were carried out—we lived with these questions for nearly two decades. We worked with clinicians as they were developing and offering the procedure, with researchers in refining and studying the procedure, and with pregnant women and their partners as they considered whether to undergo the procedure. From this experience in the early studies at Vanderbilt, we learned that pregnant women and their partners approach the clinical uncertainty of such a risky procedure with a curious and unique combination of practicality, self-reflection, fear, and overwhelming hope. These early experiences were a major contributing factor to the inclusion of an ethics-focused interview in the informed consent process for the Management of Myelomeningocele Study (MOMS) trial study design

Alternative medicine · Clinical Ethics · Engineering ethics · Fetal surgery · Fetus · In utero · Informed consent · Neural tube defect · Obstetrics · Pregnancy · Spina bifida · Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations · Surgery

• Parents, Physicians, and Spina Bifida

  Rosalyn Benjamin Darling•The Hastings Center Report•1977

  Add to list

• Operating on the Fetus

  William Ruddick, William Wilcox et al.•The Hastings Center Report•1982

  Add to list