Rights and Wrongs in Talk of Mind-Reading Technology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21598569 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen Rainey (0000-0002-5540-6046, Delft University of Technology, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 521-531 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0963-1801 • E-ISSN: 1469-2147 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0963180124000045 |
| PMID | 38362894 |
| OpenAlex | W4391879594 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 11 |
This article examines the idea of mind-reading technology by focusing on an interesting case of applying a large language model (LLM) to brain data. On the face of it, experimental results appear to show that it is possible to reconstruct mental contents directly from brain data by processing via a chatGPT-like LLM. However, the author argues that this apparent conclusion is not warranted. Through examining how LLMs work, it is shown that they are importantly different from natural language. The former operates on the basis of nonrational data transformations based on a large textual corpus. The latter has a rational dimension, being based on reasons. Using this as a basis, it is argued that brain data does not directly reveal mental content, but can be processed to ground predictions indirectly about mental content. The author concludes that this is impressive but different in principle from technology-mediated mind reading. The applications of LLM-based brain data processing are nevertheless promising for speech rehabilitation or novel communication methods
Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Linguistics · Cognitive Functions and Memory · Computer Science · EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces · Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|