On the alternative modernity in permacultural ethos

Back to the land as a progress of a different kind

Bibliographic Data

ID21598845
AuthorsKarel Němeček (0009-0006-4170-1163, Masaryk University, corresponding author), Pavel Pospěch (0000-0002-4048-683X, Masaryk University)
Year2025
Publication date2025-11-27
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEnvironmental Values (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0963-2719 • E-ISSN: 1752-7015
PublisherSAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/09632719251398064
OpenAlexW4416756593
LanguageEN
References cited30

This paper focuses on the permaculture movement and its ethos, as expressed in various permacultural books. It aims to reconstruct this ethos and assess its relation to the significatory dimension of modernity. We analyse the ethos vis-à-vis the works of Wagner, Castoriadis, Boltanski and Thévenot. Based on the empirical material we analysed through multi-stage thematic analysis, we argue that while permaculture certainly is a back-to-the-land movement, it advocates for a rationalising reorganisation rather than reversal of contemporary social organisation. As we show, permaculturists present the permanent sustainability they advocate for as necessary progress achieved through the rationalisation of the society-nature relationship with adherence to ideals of individual autonomy and rational mastery over the environmental impacts of human-made productive systems. In permaculture's self-portrait, the failures of contemporary agriculture do not stem from an excessive adherence to the core principles of modernity but from a lack of such adherence. We show that the permaculturists’ critique of industrial mass agriculture as wasteful and irrational and their call for a more holistic and permanently sustainable alternative does not present only a concrete utopia but also a call for modernising offensive made with adherence to these principles. Our paper thus contributes to the discussion of modernity and its alternatives, as well as to the more general question of the legitimacy of the latter: what makes alternative environmental movements legitimate, and what makes them appear modern or anti-modern? What are the mechanisms through which alternative environmental movements, such as permaculture, legitimise themselves

Agrarian society · Autonomy · Consumerism · Ethos · Legitimacy · Modernity · Rationalisation · Sustainability · Utopia · Climate Change and Health Impacts · Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution · Environmental, Ecological, and Cultural Studies

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access