Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Navigating visions, knowledge and practical challenges in coastal zone planning

Bibliographic Data

ID21600002
AuthorsMaiken Bjørkan (0000-0002-5560-8633, Nordland Research Institute, Bodø, Norway, corresponding author), Stine Rybråten (0000-0003-2877-3868, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Lillehammer, Norway), Aase Kristine Lundberg (0000-0001-5812-6034, Nordland Research Institute, Bodø, Norway)
Year2021
Volume64
Issue10
Pages1816-1837
Publication date2021-08-24
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Environmental Planning and Management (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-0568 • E-ISSN: 1360-0559
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09640568.2020.1838266
OpenAlexW3110806930
LanguageEN
References cited31

This paper explores what happens when the ideal of sustainable development meets the real and pressing problems in coastal zone planning. Insights into how coastal zone planners understand environmental problems and navigate political visions, knowledge requirements, stakeholder involvement and local conditions, are key to understanding how to develop a holistic approach in line with sustainable development. The paper applies Q-methodology to identify the dominant discourses and explore planners’ perceptions and practices for sustainable coastal zone management. The Q sorts were realized in 2018–2019 in Northern Norway with planners in 10 small municipalities and 8 county level representatives. It is argued that it provides new insights into the challenges that planners face in striking a balance between the overarching values and the practical tasks that planners face in everyday planning; and that the interpretation of factors using Q-methodology should focus on all statements to ensure holism and avoid overlooking important information

Business · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Political science · Process management · Sociology · Vision · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Coastal and Marine Management · Environmental Science · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy

  • Science in action

    Bruno Latour•Science in action•1987

  • Doing Q Methodological Research

    Simon Watts, Paul Stenner•Doing Q Methodological Research•2012

  • Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management

    Open Access•Jentoft, Svein Jentoft•Marine Policy•2000

  • Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem

    Open Access•Jentoft, Svein Jentoft et al.•Marine Policy•2009

  • Null

    Open Access•null null•Philosophy study•2016

  • Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’

    Geraint Ellis, John Barry et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2007

  • Seeking sustainability discourses with Q methodology

    Open Access•John Barry, John L R Proops et al.•Ecological Economics•1999

  • Re-Examining the Role of Knowledge Within Planning Theory

    Open Access•Yvonne Rydin•Planning Theory•2007

  • A framework for agenda-setting ocean acidification through boundary work

    Open Access•Halvor Dannevig, Kyrre Groven et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2019

  • Public responses to climate change

    Open Access•Kathryn Hobson, Shirley Niemeyer•Global Environmental Change•2011

  • Reconstructive Democratic Theory

    Open Access•John S Dryzek, Jeffrey Berejikian et al.•American Political Science Review•1993

  • Risk and Environment as Legitimatory Discourses of Technology

    Open Access•Brian Wynne•Current Sociology•2002

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae