Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Who supports climate mitigation through increasing renewable energy surcharge? Evidence from an online survey in South Korea

Bibliographic Data

ID21600140
AuthorsInhwan Ko (0000-0003-4787-1666, University of Nevada, Reno, corresponding author)
Year2026
Volume69
Issue5
Pages1569-1588
Publication date2026-04-16
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Environmental Planning and Management (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0964-0568 • E-ISSN: 1360-0559
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09640568.2024.2439875
OpenAlexW4405987127
LanguageEN
References cited58

Renewable energy surcharge (RES) is a cost levied upon electricity consumers per their electricity consumption to promote climate mitigation by subsidizing renewable energy expansion. Increasing the surcharge price allows the government to raise additional resources for renewable energy subsidies to accelerate deeper decarbonization, yet subject to public opposition. Drawing on evidence from an original online survey in South Korea, I find that the support for increasing RES price is shaped by respondents’ general perceptions of local costs and benefits from solar farms. Respondents who believe solar energy farms disrupt the landscape are less likely to support the surcharge increase, while those who believe solar farms reduce local air pollution are more likely to support it. The finding suggests that governments that use renewable energy subsidies for climate mitigation must mitigate the negative impacts of renewable energy facilities on local communities to ensure their political feasibility

Business · Climate change · Climate change mitigation · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Natural resource economics · Renewable energy · Survey data collection · Energy and Environment Impacts · Engineering · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Environmental Science · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Geology

  • Carbon Captured

    Matto Mildenberger•Carbon Captured•2020

  • Statistical Rethinking

    Richard Mcelreath•Statistical Rethinking•2020

  • Sources of opposition to renewable energy projects in the United States

    Open Access•Lawrence Susskind, Jungwoo Chun et al.•Energy Policy•2022

  • Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences

    Andrew Gelman, Donald B Rubin•Statistical Science•1992

  • Proximity, Nimbyism, and Public Support for Energy Infrastructure

    Open Access•David M Konisky, Stephen Ansolabehere et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Renewable and nonrenewable energy consumption, trade and CO 2 emissions in high emitter countries

    Tehreem Fatima, Umer Shahzad et al.•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2021

  • Climate mitigation policies and the potential pathways to conflict

    Open Access•E A Gilmore, Halvard Buhaug•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2021

  • Revenue use and public support for a carbon tax

    Open Access•Matthew C Nowlin, Kuhika Gupta et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2020

  • To support or oppose renewable energy projects? A systematic literature review on the factors influencing landscape design and social acceptance

    Open Access•Merel Enserink, R van Etteger et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2022

  • Farmers vs. lakers

    Open Access•Douglas L Bessette, Sarah Mills•Energy Research & Social Science•2020

  • Rural opposition to landscape change from solar energy

    Open Access•Inhwan Ko•Energy Research & Social Science•2023

  • Safeguarding rural landscapes in the new era of energy transition to a low carbon future

    Open Access•Michael Jefferson•Energy Research & Social Science•2017

  • Who should pay to support renewable electricity? Exploring regressive impacts, energy poverty and tariff equity

    Open Access•Paolo Mastropietro•Energy Research & Social Science•2019

  • For the love of sun and wind? Proximity to renewable energy facilities and support for renewable power across time and space in the United States

    Open Access•Adam Mayer, Shawn Hazboun et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2021

  • Marketing Renewable Energy through Geopolitics

    Itay Fischhendler, Daniel Nathan et al.•Global Environmental Politics•2015

  • Backlash to Climate Policy

    Open Access•James Patterson•Global Environmental Politics•2022

  • Cool Rationalities and Hot Air

    John Barry, Geraint Ellis et al.•Global Environmental Politics•2008

  • Prisoners of the Wrong Dilemma

    Michaël Aklin, Matto Mildenberger•Global Environmental Politics•2020

  • Harnessing Community Energies

    Gordon Walker, Sue Hunter et al.•Global Environmental Politics•2007

  • Against the wind

    Open Access•Fritz Reusswig, Florian Braun et al.•Utilities Policy•2016

  • Policy design and public support for carbon tax

    Open Access•Nives Dolšak, Christopher Adolph et al.•Public Administration•2020

  • The ‘Social Gap’ in Wind Farm Siting Decisions

    Derek Bell, Tim Gray et al.•Environmental Politics•2005

  • Energy transition, rural transformation and local land-use planning

    Open Access•Kirby Calvert, Emily Smit et al.•Environment and Planning E Nature…•2021

  • It Is All about Political Incentives

    Patrick Bayer, Johannes Urpelainen•The Journal of Politics•2016

  • Three Faces of Climate Justice

    Open Access•Nives Dolšak, Aseem Prakash•Annual Review of Political Science•2022

  • Electoral Backlash against Climate Policy

    Open Access•Leah C Stokes, Leah Stokes•American Journal of Political…•2016

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae