“They’re the ones that sent me down a flooded road”
Trust, distrust, and individuals’ flood mitigation decisions
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21600387 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Luke H Briccetti (0000-0003-4986-3192, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont, autor de correspondencia), Kimberly J Coleman (0000-0001-7693-246X, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont), Lakelyn E Taylor (0000-0002-7683-180X, Rubenstein School of Environment and Natural Resources, University of Vermont) |
| Año | 2025 |
| Páginas | 1-23 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2025-08-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Journal of Environmental Planning and Management (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0964-0568 • E-ISSN: 1360-0559 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09640568.2025.2524444 |
| OpenAlex | W4412929702 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referencias citadas | 51 |
Extreme weather intensification due to climate change will necessitate significant human adaptation, either by implementing flood mitigation measures, or by vacating flood zones altogether. Although household-level decision-making strategies for flood mitigation have been studied, little attention has been given to how these decisions are made when repeated floods occur. To address this gap, we interviewed 13 flood-impacted residents of Waterbury, VT – a community that has experienced recent reoccurring flooding – to explore the factors influencing their flood mitigation decisions. Using Trust Ecology as a theoretical framework to guide our analysis, we uncovered key themes relevant to the adoption of mitigation behaviors. Specifically, our results suggest that two forms of distrust – rational and procedural – played important roles in determining behavior following repeated flooding. These findings are relevant for practitioners who assist with localized flood mitigation efforts and advance an understanding of how (dis)trust impacts mitigation efforts broadly
Business · Distrust · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Flood myth · Geography · Natural resource economics · Political science · Climate Change, Adaptation, Migration · Disaster Management and Resilience · Environmental Science · Flood Risk Assessment and Management · Law
A New Era for Collaborative Forest Management
Governing the Commons
A Review of Risk Perceptions and Other Factors that Influence Flood Mitigation Behavior
Trust Repair After An Organization-Level Failure
Trust And Social Representations Of The Management Of Threatened And Endangered Species
An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
Insights into Flood‐Coping Appraisals of Protection Motivation Theory
The Role Of Causal Attribution Dimensions In Trust Repair
An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
Comparing public expectations with local planning efforts to mitigate coastal hazards
Perceptions and practice in Natural Flood Management
Mitigating compound coastal water hazards in Eastern North Carolina
Urban flood resilience, a multi-level institutional analysis of planning practices in the Metropolitan City of Naples
Assigning Blame
Vulnerability and Resilience to Natural Hazards
Climate Change 2014 Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability
Willingness of homeowners to mitigate climate risk through insurance
Sample sizes for saturation in qualitative research
Unpacking Protection Motivation Theory
Avoiding or mitigating flooding
Exploring the Functions of Different Forms of Trust in Collaborative Natural Resource Management
Community/Agency Trust and Public Involvement in Resource Planning
The Power of Trust
The Multidimensionality of Trust
The Shared Antecedents of Trust and Distrust
Sampling Knowledge
Trust ecology and the resilience of natural resource management institutions
Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research
| Velocidad de citación | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | No |