The mnemonic effect of central and peripheral misinformation on social media
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21602082 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ezgi Bilgin (0000-0001-9477-7379, Cornell University, corresponding author), Qi Wang (0000-0003-0464-2118, Cornell University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 369-382 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-15 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Memory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09658211.2024.2323935 |
| PMID | 38466618 |
| OpenAlex | W4392641084 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 68 |
The increasing use of social media has amplified the spread of false information. Yet little is known about the mnemonic consequences associated with exposure to different types of false information online. In two studies, we examined in a simulated online context how exposure to false information either central or peripheral in events affected memory. European American and Asian/Asian American college students (Study 1 N = 200; Study 2 N = 225) were presented with GIFs of daily life events and read tweets about the events that included four types of information: central true information, central false information, peripheral true information, and peripheral false information. They then took a True/False recognition test that included tweeted and untweeted true and false information and indicated how confident they were in their responses. Regardless of cultural background, participants in both studies demonstrated the misinformation effect, whereby they falsely recognised more and resisted less tweeted than untweeted false information. Furthermore, they showed higher susceptibility to peripheral than central false information exposed via tweets. Asian participants were less influenced by misinformation than European Americans in Study 2. These findings have important implications to combat misinformation in online environments
Cognitive psychology · False Memory · Misinformation · Mnemonic · Recall · Social media · Computer Science · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Memory Processes and Influences · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Psychology
Fuzzy-Trace Theory and False Memory
Fuzzy-trace theory
Emmeans
Culture and point of view
Semantic integration of verbal information into a visual memory.
The influence of culture
Individual Differences in Analytic Versus Holistic Thinking
Leading questions and the eyewitness report
The Measurement of Independent and Interdependent Self-Construals
G*Power 3
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Push polls increase false memories for fake news stories
Remembering and forgetting information about the Covid-19 vaccine on Twitter
Deepfake false memories
Memory online
Culture influences how people divide continuous sensory experience into events
How word decoding skill impacts text memory
Studying cognitive development in cultural context
Does Sharing Memories Make Us Feel Closer? The Roles of Memory Type and Culture
Emotional stress and eyewitness memory
Remembering the self in cultural contexts
False memories of fabricated political events
Source monitoring
Cultural Differences in Memory for Objects and Backgrounds in Pictures
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |