Probing emotional recognition memory
How different response formats affect response behaviour
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21602240 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tobias Sommer (0000-0002-3504-7357, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf), Romy Schröter (0000-0002-4018-0267, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf), Janine Bayer (0000-0003-4681-4571, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 9 |
| Pages | 1216-1231 |
| Publication date | 2021-10-21 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Memory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09658211.2021.1974049 |
| PMID | 34486950 |
| OpenAlex | W3198819629 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 57 |
Receiver-operating characteristic curves from confidence ratings and remember/know (R/K) judgments are often used to estimate the contribution of familiarity and recollection to recognition memory. Both coming with specific advantages and disadvantages, which could be reduced by their combination. Little is known how the combination of both methods impacts response behaviour. This could be particularly important for emotional memory research, which is susceptible to variation in meta-mnemonic processes. We obtained reference performance indices from the two methods, instructing individuals to give confidence ratings or R/K judgments in one step. Against these, we contrasted R/K judgments in a two-step format and two combined formats, confidence ratings followed by R/K judgments and vice versa. Regarding reference formats, confidence ratings resulted in more liberal response criteria and false alarm rates than R/K judgments. Two-step R/K judgments and confidence ratings followed by R/K judgments resulted in patterns similar to one-step R/K judgments. Reversing the order resulted in more liberal response biases, higher hit and false alarms rates. Recollection and familiarity were unaffected by response formats. Valence effects did not vary with response formats. The present results suggest that confidence ratings followed by R/K judgments provide the advantages of both without biasing response behaviour
Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Constant false alarm rate · Mnemonic · Recall · Recognition memory · Response bias · Communication · Computer Science · Memory and Neural Mechanisms · Memory Processes and Influences · Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Two-stage dynamic signal detection
Recollection and familiarity
How to measure metacognition
Memory and consciousness.
Are affective events richly recollected or simply familiar? The experience and process of recognizing feelings past.
The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity
Least-Squares Means
A process dissociation framework
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Remembering and Knowing
The influence of instructions and terminology on the accuracy of remember–know judgments
On interpreting the relationship between remember–know judgments and confidence
A signal detection theoretic approach for estimating metacognitive sensitivity from confidence ratings
Signal-Detection, Threshold, and Dual-Process Models of Recognition Memory
Measuring recollection and familiarity
Interactions among emotional attention, encoding, and retrieval of ambiguous information
Emotionally negative pictures enhance gist memory
Detection theory analysis of group data
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |