Face masks degrade our ability to remember face-name associations more than predicted by judgments of learning

Bibliographic Data

ID21602371
AuthorsAlexandra M Rodriguez (0000-0002-8833-7817, University of Tampa), Sara B Festini (0000-0001-7135-2642, University of Tampa, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume32
Issue2
Pages143-155
Publication date2024-02-07
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMemory (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09658211.2023.2299361
PMID38166650
OpenAlexW4390521640
LanguageEN
References cited65

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, face masks became required attire. Face masks obstruct the bottom portion of faces, restricting face processing. The present study examined the influence face masks have on memory predictions and memory performance for new face-name associations. Participants studied face-name pairs presented for 8 s (Experiment 1) or 10 s (Experiment 2). Half of the face-name pairs included a face mask obstructing the nose and mouth of the pictured face, counterbalanced across participants. Participants provided item-by-item judgements of learning (JOLs) and completed subsequent cued recall and associative recognition memory tests. Both experiments demonstrated that face masks impaired memory for newly-learned names, however, the magnitude of the mask impact was under-predicted by JOLs. The presence of a face mask negatively influenced memory performance to a greater degree than participants' JOLs predicted. Results have implications for name learning during pandemics, as well as in settings where face masks are common (e.g., medical field)

Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Metacognition · Metamemory · Recall · Face recognition and analysis · Face Recognition and Perception · Memory Processes and Influences · Neuroscience · Psychology

Tools

Open DOI