Response time concealed information test using fillers in cybercrime and concealed identity scenarios
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21602440 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gáspár Lukács (0000-0001-9401-4830, University of Vienna, corresponding author), Ulrich Ansorge (0000-0002-2421-9942, University of Vienna) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 767-783 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Memory (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0965-8211 • E-ISSN: 1464-0686 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09658211.2023.2195179 |
| PMID | 37002912 |
| OpenAlex | W4362454805 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 57 |
The Response Time Concealed Information Test (RT-CIT) can reveal that a person recognises a relevant item (e.g., a murder weapon) among other control items, based on slower responses to the former compared to the latter ones. To date, the RT-CIT has been predominantly examined only in the context of scenarios that are very unlikely in real life, while sporadic assessment has shown that it suffers from low diagnostic accuracy in more realistic scenarios. In our study, we validated the RT-CIT in the new, realistic, and very topical mock scenario of a cybercrime (Study 1, n = 614; Study 2; n = 553), finding significant though moderate effects. At the same time (and expanded with a concealed identity scenario; Study 3, n = 250), we assessed the validity and generalizability of the filler items presented in the RT-CIT: We found similar diagnostic accuracies when using specific, generic, and even nonverbal items. However, the relatively low diagnostic accuracy in case of the cybercrime scenario reemphasizes the importance of assessments in realistic scenarios as well as the need for further improving the RT-CIT
Computer security · Cybercrime · Deception · Developmental psychology · Generalizability theory · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Social Psychology
Ggplot2
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
An introduction to ROC analysis
Semantic priming without association
What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors
BayestestR
Why Psychologists Should by Default Use Welch’s t-test Instead of Student’s t-test
Equivalence Testing for Psychological Research
Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science
Incidental learning of proper names and “earwitness” recall
The mechanism of filler items in the response time concealed information test
Detecting concealed language knowledge via response times
Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition
The pitfall of experimenting on the web
Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments
Lying takes time
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |