The force and the content of judgment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21603376 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sebastian Rödl (0000-0002-8273-1397, University of Leipzig Leipzig Germany, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 506-517 |
| Publication date | 2020-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0966-8373 • E-ISSN: 1468-0378 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ejop.12541 |
| OpenAlex | W3017384018 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 9 |
This essay explores what it means to reject Frege's distinction of force and content: the rejection completes Frege's anti‐psychologism as it leaves no space for a psychological concept of judgment distinct from the logical concept, which is the concern of no empirical science, but of logic. It emerges that logic, as the science of judgement, is — not a metaphysics of judgement, but — metaphysics. And it emerges that the opposition of subject to subject — the elementary nexus of thinker to thinker in dialogue — is contained within the logical concept of judgment
Epistemology · Judgement · Logical analysis · Logical consequence · Metaphysics · Political science · Psychologism · Computer Science · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Philosophy, Science, and History · Psychology · Wittgensteinian philosophy and applications
| Citations per year | 0.5 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |