Why Immortality Could Be Good
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21604131 |
|---|---|
| Autores | John Martin Fischer (0000-0002-1685-4743, Philosophy, University of California Riverside, Riverside, USA, autor de correspondencia) |
| Año | 2024 |
| Volumen | 32 |
| Número | 1 |
| Páginas | 78-100 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2024-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | No |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | International Journal of Philosophical Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0967-2559 • E-ISSN: 1466-4542 |
| Editorial | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09672559.2023.2286537 |
| OpenAlex | W4389346109 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 1 |
| Referencias citadas | 16 |
I revisit my article, “Why Immortality Is Not So Bad,” in which I argued that Bernard Williams’s thesis that immortality would necessarily be boring for any human being is false. Here I point out various ways in which Williams’s treatment of the issues has tilted and distorted the subsequent debates
Epistemology · Immortality · Theology · Philosophical Ethics and Theory · Philosophy · Political Theology and Sovereignty · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 0,5 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |