Democracy and modern political community
Limits and Possibilities
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2160418 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sunil Khilnani (Birkbeck, University of London, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1991 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 196-204 |
| Publication date | 1991-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Economy and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-5147 • E-ISSN: 1469-5766 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03085149100000009 |
| OpenAlex | W2075669228 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 21 |
There are various limits to what is politically possible. The exigencies of economic production and exchange represent one crucial limit to possible political structures. Inherited Marxist and liberal conceptions of the relation between economic systems and political structures are incoherent; these relations need to be reconceived, yet recent socialist political thinking has preferred to focus mainly on the political domain, pursuing a theory of self-governing community. Can there today be a coherent account of such a theory? One way of showing there cannot is by pressing the question of the contours an dsubstance of modern political community. Optimistic theorists of self-governing community rely on a self-enclosed, determinate conception of community that has its imaginative roots in a vision of ancient liberty: the demos exercising legitimate and effective agency over a particular territory. But modern political community cannot be conceived of in this way: because of the presence of global processes of economic causality, there is today no fit between the territorial identity of a political community and its effective powers of agency. Modern liberty (unlike its ancient counterpart) has no specific or determinate location: its availability depends upon an elaborate division of economic and political labour. In these circumstances, it no longer makes sense to heighten the stakes of membership in a political community, as optimistic theorists of democracy do when they call for a more active and participatory civil society. The for appraising what forms of the division of political labour may be legitimate
Aesthetics · Agency (philosophy · Democracy · Identity (music · Law and economics · Marxist philosophy · Political culture · Political economy · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Law · Political Economy and Marxism
The Idea of freedom
Anarchy, State, and Utopia
The Origins of Democratic Thinking
After Hegemony
Social Choice and Individual Values
Interpreting Political Responsibility
The Economic Limits to Modern Politics
Wealth and Virtue
Anarchy, State, and Utopia
Reason and Revolution
Politics in the Ancient World
The Imaginary Institution of Society
Capitalism and Social Democracy
Rethinking Modern Political Theory
Emmanuel Sieyes, Benjamin Constant et le « gouvernement des modernes ». Contribution à l'histoire du concept de représentation politique
The Cement of Society
Injustice
Imaginary presuppositions of democracy∗
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,07 |
| Citation span | 1997 - 2000 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |