Place and Philosophical Topography
Responding to Bubbio, Farin and Satne
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21604272 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J Malpas (0000-0003-4378-8937, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 299-312 |
| Publication date | 2020-03-14 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Philosophical Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0967-2559 • E-ISSN: 1466-4542 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/09672559.2020.1747680 |
| OpenAlex | W3014303279 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 13 |
Diego Bubbio, Ingo Farin and Glenda Satne have advanced a range of comments, questions and challenges relating to the ideas and arguments set out in the new edition of my Place and Experience (2018). Rather than address each of my interlocutors separately, my responses here are organized around four main topics: the relation between space and place, including the nature of space; the relation between place and subjectivity, and the foundational role of place; the relation between place and conceptuality; and the relation between place and normativity
Epistemology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Philosophy · Spatial and Cultural Studies · Walter Benjamin Studies Compilation
| Highly cited | No |
|---|