Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Some elements of political economy in the thought of Sir John Fortescue

Bibliographic Data

ID21604356
AuthorsStefano Simonetta (0000-0002-3004-4755, University of Milan, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume30
Issue2
Pages247-274
Publication date2023-03-04
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of the History of Economic Thought (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0967-2567 • E-ISSN: 1469-5936
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09672567.2022.2131864
OpenAlexW4307047738
LanguageEN
References cited36

This paper focuses on Fortescue’s analysis of the economic impact of various forms of government, based on a comparison between the material well-being which the English enjoy by virtue of their “political kingdom” and the conditions of extreme poverty of the common people in France, an effect of their political-legal system. Fortescue’s criteria for judging between different regimes are pragmatic: the main reason for his preference for the temperate monarchy of England is the fact that it gives all inhabitants full enjoyment of the fruits of their labour, and encourages the economic growth of all parts of the realm

Economic growth · Economics · Economy · Estate · Microeconomics · Monarchy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Poverty · Preference · Realm · Sociology · Virtue · Economic Theory and Institutions · Historical Economic and Legal Thought · Law · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence

  • Natural law

    Alexander Passerin DÉntrèves•Natural law•1951

  • Dominium regale et politicum

    Thomas M Osborne•Mediaeval Studies•2000

  • Virtue, Commerce, and History

    Open Access•J G A Pocock•Virtue, Commerce, and History•1985

  • The King's Two Bodies

    Norman F Cantor, Ernst H Kantorowicz•The American Historical Review•1958

  • Foundations of Political Economy

    Neal Wood•Foundations of Political Economy•1994

  • Reassessing the Henrician Age

    Alistair Fox, John Guy et al.•Renaissance and Reformation•1969

  • History of Political Thought

    Peter Schröder, Olaf Asbach et al.•German History•2012

  • The Concept of Property in the Early Common Law

    Open Access•David J Seipp•Law and History Review•1994

  • Aristotle as authority

    Cary J Nederman•History of European Ideas•1987

  • The Relation of Property and Dominion to the Law of Nature

    Edgar W Lacy•Speculum•1949

  • Sir John Fortescue on the Education of Rulers

    Charles Flinn Arrowood•Speculum•1935

  • Politics and Propaganda in Fifteenth-Century England

    Paul E Gill•Speculum•1971

  • Change and Continuity in the Tudor Constitution

    George L Mosse•Speculum•1947

  • Private Property

    Emile James, Richard Schlatter•Revue économique•1953

  • Medieval Economic Thought

    A Murray, Andrew W Murray•The English Historical Review•2003

  • King, Parliament, and Public Finance in Medieval England to 1369

    A R Bridbury, Gerald Harriss et al.•Economica•1976

  • Fortescue and the Political Theory of dominium

    Open Access•J H Burns•The Historical Journal•1985

  • Property and Protest

    Open Access•Cary J Nederman•The Review of Politics•1996

  • Dominium in Thirteenth and Fourteenth-Century Political Thought and its Seventeenth-Century Heirs

    Open Access•Janet Coleman•Political Studies•1985

  • The Royal Demesne in English History

    Edward Miller, Pamela Nadash et al.•The Economic History Review•1972

  • The Machiavellian Moment

    John Greville Agard Pocock, John Greville Agard Greville Agard Pocock•Machiavellian Moment•2009

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae