Fukuyama and liberal democracy
The Ends of History
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2160465 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jan Nederveen Pieterse (0000-0002-4631-3956) |
| Year | 1993 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 218-232 |
| Publication date | 1993-05-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Economy and Society (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0308-5147 • E-ISSN: 1469-5766 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/03085149300000012 |
| OpenAlex | W1968841105 |
| Language | EN |
Fukuyama'a work has had an uneven reception - dismissed as lightweight and applauded by American conservatives and part of the British left. His work is remarkable for the combination of national security concerns with Big Questions, but underneath the Hegelian gloss it is a conventional restatement of American belief in liberal democracy. Liberal democracy therefore is the focus of this inquiry. First the argument of Fukuyama's essay is compared with that of his book. Next his argument on liberal democracy is examined in relation to three problem areas: liberalism and its exclusions, liberalism and democracy, liberalism and imperialism. Converting history into ideas and divorcing ideas from social actors are main weaknesses of Fukuyama's argument. A major limitation of liberal democracy is that it is conceived in a nation state framework, which holds global concerns at bay and thus blocks the further global extension of democracy
Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · End of history · Hegelianism · Law and economics · Liberal democracy · Liberalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Relation (database · Sociology · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Law
| Highly cited | No |
|---|