Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fukuyama and liberal democracy

The Ends of History

Bibliographic Data

ID2160465
AuthorsJan Nederveen Pieterse (0000-0002-4631-3956)
Year1993
Volume22
Issue2
Pages218-232
Publication date1993-05-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEconomy and Society (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0308-5147 • E-ISSN: 1469-5766
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/03085149300000012
OpenAlexW1968841105
LanguageEN

Fukuyama'a work has had an uneven reception - dismissed as lightweight and applauded by American conservatives and part of the British left. His work is remarkable for the combination of national security concerns with Big Questions, but underneath the Hegelian gloss it is a conventional restatement of American belief in liberal democracy. Liberal democracy therefore is the focus of this inquiry. First the argument of Fukuyama's essay is compared with that of his book. Next his argument on liberal democracy is examined in relation to three problem areas: liberalism and its exclusions, liberalism and democracy, liberalism and imperialism. Converting history into ideas and divorcing ideas from social actors are main weaknesses of Fukuyama's argument. A major limitation of liberal democracy is that it is conceived in a nation state framework, which holds global concerns at bay and thus blocks the further global extension of democracy

Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · End of history · Hegelianism · Law and economics · Liberal democracy · Liberalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Relation (database · Sociology · Political Philosophy and Ethics · Law

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae