Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Maffeo Pantaleoni on labour exchange

Bridge between neoclassicism and Fascism

Bibliographic Data

ID21604686
AuthorsMorihiko Okada (0000-0002-9025-2548, Russian State Agrarian Correspondence University, corresponding author), Motohiro Okada
Year2021
Volume28
Issue2
Pages179-200
Publication date2021-03-04
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEuropean Journal of the History of Economic Thought (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0967-2567 • E-ISSN: 1469-5936
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/09672567.2020.1785522
OpenAlexW3038180166
LanguageEN
References cited20

This article examines Maffeo Pantaleoni’s views on labour exchange and their transition. Pantaleoni’s theory shared the neo-classicist antinomy that, despite the emphasis on agent subjectivity, disregarded the variability in the content of labour resulting from worker subjectivity towards labour performance and employer countermeasures. Consequently, Pantaleoni espoused the neoclassical principle that takes for granted the market determination of capitalistic labour exchange without socio-political intervention. The transition of Pantaleoni’s outlook on actual labour issues reflected the gulf between his faith in this principle and realities. Thus, Pantaleoni’s perspective on labour exchange functioned as a bridge between neoclassicism and Fascism

Antinomy · Art · Economics · Epistemology · Faith · Labour economics · Labour law · Neoclassical economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Subjectivity · Italian Fascism and Post-war Society · Law · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Political theory and Gramsci

  • The Nature of Labor Exchange and the Theory of Capitalist Production

    Open Access•Herbert Gintis•Review of Radical Political…•1976

  • The Italian Labor Movement

    Daniel Horowitz, Daniel L Horowitz•Italian Labor Movement•1963

  • Antonio de Viti de Marco

    Open Access•Manuela Mosca, U Adilardi et al.•Antonio de Viti de Marco•2016

  • Revisiting the Böhm-Bawerk–Edgeworth Controversy

    Morihiko Okada, Motohiro Okada•Review of Political Economy•2017

  • A Reassessment of Marx's Thought on Labour Exchange

    Morihiko Okada, Motohiro Okada•Review of Political Economy•2014

  • Vilfredo Pareto on Labor

    Morihiko Okada, Motohiro Okada•Forum for Social Economics•2015

  • An Attempt to Analyse the Concepts of "Strong and Weak" in Their Economic Connection

    M Pantaleoni•The Economic Journal•1898

  • Work and Welfare In Economic Theory

    David Collard, U Pagano•The Economic Journal•1986

  • Economics and Anti-Semitism

    Luca Michelini, Terenzio Maccabelli•History of Political Economy•2015

  • The Political Economy of Work

    Michael Perelman•History of Political Economy•2010

  • The Theory of Political Economy

    Open Access•William Stanley Jevons•Theory of Political Economy•2013

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae