Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Covid-19 Vaccines in India

Judicial Blind Spots in upholding the Right to Health

Bibliographic Data

ID21606004
AuthorsKajal Bhardwaj, Veena Johari
Year2022
Volume18
Issue1
Pages119
Publication date2022-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocio-Legal Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0973-5216
PublisherNational Law School of India University (PUBLISHER • IN)
DOI10.55496/eonp8082
OpenAlexW4395039095
LanguageEN
References cited2

The COVID-19 pandemic brought to the forefront the intrinsic link between health and human rights and exposed the conflict between public health measures and individual rights and liberties. These conflicts are apparent in the context of COVID-19 vaccines as well. Vaccines were fast-tracked, given emergency approval and produced and distributed by a few manufacturers with the help of the government and multiple agencies, to control the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the lack of transparency in regulation, the formulation of arbitrary policies, unfair pricing, unequal procurement, restricted and discriminatory distribution, lack of informed consent and lack of accountability for adverse events following immunization (AEFI) also created conflicts and controversies, exacerbated inequities and violated the right to life and health. As people turned to the courts, the judiciary received appreciation for reiterating the recognition of the constitutional right to health and nudging the government’s vaccine policy in the right direction. However, a closer look at various aspects and questions before the courts reveals certain blind spots on the part of the judiciary in fully upholding the right to health. The article relies on key elements of the right to health, in particular the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality (AAAQ) framework to analyse court orders, the government’s stand and their impact on individual and public health. This analysis is contextualized with the help of media reports, investigative journalism and interventions by civil society organisations. In presenting the right to health as an important and useful foundation for the government and the judiciary to reflect on and review the decisions and actions of the past three years, this paper seeks to lend support to efforts to ensure that the injustices and inequities of these pandemic years are not repeated

Accountability · Civil liberties · Health care · Human rights · Political science · Politics · Public health · Public relations · Right to health · COVID-19 Digital Contact Tracing · Global Security and Public Health · Human Rights and Development · Law · Medicine · Public Administration · Health Policy

  • Challenges in ensuring global access to Covid-19 vaccines

    Open Access•Olivier J Wouters, Kenneth C Shadlen et al.•The Lancet•2021

  • Who funded the research behind the Oxford–AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine

    Open Access•Samuel Cross, Yeanuk Rho et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae