Cur Deus Homo vs Homo Deus and the Evolution of Humanity
Quo Vadis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21609124 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter David Langerman (0000-0003-1054-395X, Stellenbosch University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 125-141 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-17 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Acta Theologica (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1015-8758 • E-ISSN: 2309-9089 |
| Publisher | University of the Free State (PUBLISHER • ZA) |
| DOI | 10.38140/at.v44i2.8155 |
| OpenAlex | W4406916224 |
| Language | EN |
This article deals with the profound shifts that are taking place in light of the Fourth Industrial Revolution, in whichhumanity’s future is highly topical. The article engages Thomas Merton’s re-evaluation of Anselm’s Cur Homo Deo with Harari’s book Homo Deus (2015) and argues that, while we must take Harari’s views seriously, thefuture evolution of humanity is not the human godsuggested by Harari, but that suggested by Merton, who argues that the incarnation shows God’s love for creation; shows Christ as the pattern of what it means to live a holy life, and, ultimately, shows the future of both the cosmos and humanity, where all is taken into the very heart of God. Harari views the future as the creation of a benevolent human god; Merton views the future as a place where all of creation is divinised
Humanities · Humanity · Political science · Status quo · Theology · Law · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil
| Highly cited | No |
|---|