Oncologists’ Perceptions of Strategies for Discussing the Cost of Care with Cancer Patients and the Meaning of Those Conversations
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21617187 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Allison M Scott (0000-0002-4806-7912, University of Kentucky), Jorge Figueroa Dorrego (0000-0002-9798-5680, corresponding author), Nancy Grant Harrington (0000-0001-5952-4405, University of Kentucky), Aubree A Herman (0009-0007-3120-1154, University of Kentucky) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 7 |
| Pages | 1343-1357 |
| Publication date | 2024-06-06 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Health Communication (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1041-0236 • E-ISSN: 1532-7027 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10410236.2023.2212419 |
| OpenAlex | W37190672 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 40 |
To better understand what makes cost-of-care communication between oncologists and cancer patients more or less successful, we conducted in-depth interviews with 32 oncologists (22 male, 10 female) who were board-certified in medical, surgical, or radiation oncology. Through qualitative descriptive analysis by four coders, we found that oncologists used six broad strategies to discuss cost with patients: open discussion, avoidance, reassurance, warning, outsourcing, and educating. We also found that oncologists invoked certain meanings of cost conversations: cost conversations as holistic care, coercion, a matter of timing, risking patient suspicions, advocacy, unwanted distraction, transparency, bad news delivery, problem-solving, pointless, informed decision making, or irrelevant. These meanings appeared to be linked to oncologists enacting certain strategies (e.g., oncologists who invoked cost conversations as holistic care tended to enact open discussion, those who saw cost conversations as risky tended to use avoidance). Theoretically, our results suggest that the invoked meaning of a difficult conversation may be a key explanatory mechanism for differentiating high-quality from low-quality communication in cost conversations. Practically, our findings suggest that oncologists should consider how well the invoked meaning of the cost conversation is serving their own and their patients' goals
Grounded Theory and Theoretical Coding
Embodied Metaphor In Women's Narratives About Their Experiences With Cancer
Women’s Metaphors About BRCA Gene Testing and How They Can Inform Health Communication Theory and Practice
Primary Care Physicians’ Strategic Pursuit of Multiple Goals in Cost-of-Care Conversations with Patients
The Meanings of “Open Communication” Among Couples Coping With a Cardiac Event
Saturation in qualitative research
Working toward evidence-based guidelines for cost-of-care conversations between patients and physicians
The logic of message design
Being Open without Talking about It
Invited Review Article
Office Visit Copayments
Communicative Conduct in Commercial Medicine
| Highly cited | No |
|---|