United we stand
A principle-based negotiation training for collective bargaining
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21620149 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michel Mann (0000-0003-1771-4651, Leuphana University of Lüneburg, corresponding author), Marco Warsitzka (0000-0002-7254-3691, Leuphana University of Lüneburg), Joachim Hüffmeier (0000-0002-0490-7035, TU Dortmund University), Roman Trötschel (0009-0009-3817-873X, Leuphana University of Lüneburg) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 427-452 |
| Publication date | 2024-02-13 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Conflict Management (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1044-4068 • E-ISSN: 1758-8545 |
| Publisher | Emerald (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1108/ijcma-05-2023-0088 |
| OpenAlex | W4389215139 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 63 |
Purpose This study aims to identify effective behaviors in labor-management negotiation (LMN) and, on that basis, derive overarching psychological principles of successful negotiation in this important context. These empirical findings are used to develop and test a comprehensive negotiation training program. Design/methodology/approach Twenty-seven practitioners from one of the world’s largest labor unions were interviewed to identify the requirements of effective LMN, resulting in 796 descriptions of single behaviors from 41 negotiation cases. Findings The analyses revealed 13 categories of behaviors critical to negotiation success. The findings highlight the pivotal role of the union negotiator by illustrating how they lead the negotiations with the other party while also ensuring that their own team and the workforce stand united. To provide guidance for effective LMN, six psychological principles were derived from these behavioral categories. The paper describes a six-day training program developed for LMN based on the empirical findings of this study and the related six principles. Originality/value This paper has three unique features: first, it examines the requirements for effective LMN based on a systematic needs assessment. Second, by teaching not only knowledge and skills but also general psychological principles of successful negotiation, the training intervention is aimed at promoting long-term behavioral change. Third, the research presents a comprehensive and empirically-based training program for LMN
Empirical research · Knowledge management · Negotiation · Originality · Political science · Public relations · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior · Labor Movements and Unions · Psychology · Social Psychology · Workplace Violence and Bullying
Organizational Identity Formation and Change
Learning Styles and Learning Spaces
Teaching personal initiative beats traditional training in boosting small business in West Africa
Twenty-Five Years of Hidden Profiles in Group Decision Making
Learning and transfer
Transfer of Training
An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust
But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation
Barriers to Conflict Resolution
Beyond the group mind
Training the Warrior-Diplomat
From Research to Application
A Look into the Mind of the Negotiator
Why hawks fly higher than doves
A retrospective on the behavioral theory of labor negotiations
Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups
Open to offers, but resisting requests
What’s Driving the New Economy
Implementation intentions and the willful pursuit of prosocial goals in negotiations
Negotiation arithmetic
Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement
Perspective taking as a means to overcome motivational barriers in negotiations
The consideration of future consequences
Benefits of Training and Development for Individuals and Teams, Organizations, and Society
The critical incident technique
Grounded theory research
Dimensions of Local Union Effectiveness
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |