Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Perception of Cognitive Biases in Decision-Making Scale (PCBDM-S)

Development and initial validation of a self-report measure for assessing cognitive bias perception

Bibliographic Data

ID21622006
AuthorsTuğba Ay (0000-0002-9147-3625, Marmara University, corresponding author), Ali Özdemir (0000-0001-6089-1966, Marmara University)
Year2025
Volume44
Issue12
Pages12820-12834
Publication date2025-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCurrent Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1046-1310 • E-ISSN: 1936-4733
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s12144-025-08053-x
OpenAlexW4411387443
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited50

Cognitive biases play a significant role in the decision-making process covering medical, financial, social, and personal choices. Our review indicated that the need for reliable measures to assess perception of cognitive biases. The current study aimed to develop a self-report measure to assess the perception of cognitive biases in decision-making and to test its initial psychometric properties. In the study, exploratory factor analysis was conducted with Sample 1, while confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a six-factor model in Sample 2, showing satisfactory reliability. The total sample consisted of 453 randomly selected Turkish adults, 302 of whom are women (66.67%), and 151 are men (33.33%), with ages ranging from 18 to 65 years ( M = 33.25, SD = 9.50). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.88, indicating good internal consistency. The Perception of Cognitive Biases in Decision-Making Scale (PCBDM-S) scores were found to be negatively correlated with mindfulness scores. PCBDM-S consists of six dimensions: Framing and Anchoring bias, Overconfidence bias, Sunk-Cost bias, Status-Quo bias, Confirmatory bias, and Availability bias. The findings provide preliminary evidence of the psychometric properties of the PCBDM-S, suggesting that the scale holds promise for further validation as a tool to assess perception of cognitive biases in decision-making

Cognition · Cognitive bias · Confirmatory factor analysis · Cronbach's alpha · Developmental psychology · Overconfidence effect · Perception · Psychometrics · Response bias · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Clinical Psychology · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Psychological counsellors awareness of cognitive biases

    Zeyneb Güç, Ali Özdemir•British Journal of Guidance and…•2026

  • Applied Multivariate Research

    Lawrence S Meyers, Glenn Gamst et al.•Applied Multivariate Research•2017

  • At the Intersection of Emotion and Cognition

    Open Access•Laura L Carstensen, Joseph A Mikels•Current Directions in Psychological…•2005

  • Starting at the Beginning

    David L Streiner•Journal of Personality Assessment•2003

  • Boys will be Boys

    Brad M Barber, Terry Odean•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2001

  • Figuring Out Factors

    Open Access•David L Streiner•The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry•1994

  • Bounded Rationality

    Herbert A Simon•Utility and Probability•1990

  • Advances in prospect theory

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Journal of Risk and Uncertainty•1992

  • Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis

    Li‐tze Hu, Peter M Bentler•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•1999

  • Constructing validity

    Lesley A Clark, Lee Anna Clark et al.•Psychological Assessment•1995

  • A Quantitative Approach to Content Validity 1

    Open Access•C H Lawshe•Personnel Psychology•1975

  • Rational choice and the structure of the environment.

    H A Simon•Psychological Review•1956

  • Cognitive biases and mindfulness

    Open Access•Philip Z Maymin, Ellen J Langer•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2021

  • The heuristics-and-biases inventory

    Open Access•Vincent Berthet, Vincent De Gardelle•Frontiers in Psychology•2023

  • Heuristics as adaptive decision strategies in management

    Open Access•Florian Artinger, Malte Petersen et al.•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2014

  • Decision‐making competence and cognitive abilities

    Open Access•Kenny Skagerlund, Mattias Forsblad et al.•Journal of Behavioral Decision…•2021

  • Prospect Theory Goes Public

    Open Access•Nicky Belle, Nicola Belle et al.•Public Administration Review•2018

  • Scale Development Research

    Open Access•Roger L Worthington, Tiffany A Whittaker•The Counseling Psychologist•2006

  • Factor Analysis in Counseling Psychology Research, Training, and Practice

    Open Access•Jeffrey H Kahn•The Counseling Psychologist•2006

  • Diagnosing individual barriers to collective learning

    Tanya Heikkila, Andrea K Gerlak et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2024

  • Attribution and the psychology of prediction

    Richard E Nisbett, Eugene Borgida•Journal of Personality and Social…•1975

  • The benefits of being present

    Kirk Warren Brown, Richard M Ryan•Journal of Personality and Social…•2003

  • Individual differences in adult decision-making competence

    W Bruine De Bruin, Andrew M Parker et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2007

  • Availability

    Open Access•Amos Tversky, Daniel Kahneman•Cognitive Psychology•1973

  • The theory of decision making

    Ward Edwards•Psychological Bulletin•1954

  • Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality

    Dale T Miller, M G Ro et al.•Psychological Bulletin•1975

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae