Effect of Anthropomorphizing Food Animals on Intentions to Eat Meat
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2162285 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Craig A Johnson (0000-0002-3257-7280, corresponding author), Craig Johnson (0000-0003-4361-9703, Hofstra University), George Schreer (Manhattanville College), George E Schreer, Katherine Jacobs Bao (0000-0002-8062-2699, North Carolina Community College System Office, Raleigh, NC, USA) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 34 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 563-578 |
| Publication date | 2021-07-04 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Anthrozoös (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0892-7936 • E-ISSN: 1753-0377 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/08927936.2021.1914442 |
| OpenAlex | W3160980248 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 41 |
Awareness that others have human qualities (humanizing) generally results in a more favorable treatment of those others. Recent research has found that nonhuman entities (e.g., animals, the planet) also benefit when people view them as having human qualities (anthropomorphizing). Do those benefits of humanizing also extend to the animals we consume? Two studies were conducted to address that question. In both studies, participants were given a short writing task designed to elicit an anthropomorphized view of the target followed by measures of their diet plans and decisions regarding dilemmas that pitted human interests against animal and environmental interests. In study 1 (n = 58) the target animal was a cow and in study 2 (n = 146) the target animals were a cow and a pig. The key finding, consistent across both studies, was that gender moderated the effect of the anthropomorphism manipulation. Females expressed less interest in eating beef (Study 1) and more willingness to try a meat-free diet (Study 2) after anthropomorphizing the food animals compared with the control condition. In contrast, males expressed more interest in eating beef and less willingness to try a meat-free diet after anthropomorphizing food animals. The gender differences can be understood as resulting from differences in the way men and women view animals and meat consumption. The pattern found with meat-eating plans did not extend to decisions on the animal-related dilemmas. Thus, anthropomorphizing food animals is not uniformly beneficial or harmful to the animals, but depends on the gender of those asked to humanize
Animal welfare · Animal-assisted therapy · Biology · Consumption (sociology · HUBzero · Pet therapy · Animal and Plant Science Education · Human-Animal Interaction Studies · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Ecology · Social Psychology
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Empathic and social dominance orientations help explain gender differences in environmentalism
Don’t Mind Meat? The Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Human Consumption
Dehumanization and Infrahumanization
The Psychology of Eating Animals
Common Ideological Roots of Speciesism and Generalized Ethnic Prejudice
When Meat Gets Personal, Animals’ Minds Matter Less
Gender Differences in Human–Animal Interactions
Real men don’t eat (vegetable) quiche
But I Don’t Eat that Much Meat”
"Anthropomorphism and Anthropomorphic Selection—Beyond the "Cute Response
Attitudes toward Animals
Can you have your meat and eat it too? Conscientious omnivores, vegetarians, and adherence to diet
Too humanlike to increase my appetite
Meat-related cognitive dissonance
Impression management and food intake. Current directions in research
The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals
Psychological essentialism and the differential attribution of uniquely human emotions to ingroups and outgroups
Longitudinal effects of human supremacy beliefs and vegetarianism threat on moral exclusion (vs. inclusion) of animals
Psychological Mechanisms in the Human Use of Animals
Saving Mr. Nature
Mangy mutt or furry friend? Anthropomorphism promotes animal welfare
Social dominance orientation and the political psychology of gender
Naturalizing Anthropomorphism
The ascent of man
Friends with benefits
Inclusion of Other in the Self Scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness
They see us as less than human
Toward a psychology of human-animal relations
Anthropomorphizing Dogs
Is Meat Male? A Quantitative Multimethod Framework to Establish Metaphoric Relationships
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,67 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |