Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mapping perceptions of energy transition pathways

Ascribed motives and effectiveness

Bibliographic Data

ID21625780
AuthorsRouven Doran (0000-0002-2773-0068, University of Bergen, corresponding author), Gisela Böhm (0000-0002-5324-6990, University of Inland Norway), Hans-Rüdiger Pfister, Hans‐Rüdiger Pfister (Leuphana University of Lüneburg), Daniel Hanss (0000-0001-6692-3316, Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences)
Year2023
Volume42
Issue20
Pages16661-16673
Publication date2023-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCurrent Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1046-1310 • E-ISSN: 1936-4733
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s12144-022-02804-w
OpenAlexW4214717790
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited45

This study examines how people perceive possible pathways of a societal transition towards less carbon intensive means of energy production and use. Data were collected with questionnaires among samples of university students in Norway ( N = 106) and Germany ( N = 142). Participants selected from a set of 15 motives those which they considered to be strongly associated with each of 25 pathways, including examples such as public transportation and nuclear power. Participants also rated the effectiveness of each single pathway, that is, their perceived impact on climate change. Results indicate that the various pathways were associated with specific motives; for example, individual actions such as taking public transportation were closely associated with a self-restraint motive, pathways such as nuclear power and market strategies such as carbon offsets were closely associated with motives supporting free market and progress, and technological solutions such as solar panels and hydro power were associated with the motive for sufficient energy supply. The German and the Norwegian sample did not differ markedly in which pathways were associated with which motives; nor did effectiveness ratings for pathways differ between samples. Solar panels, wind farms, and hydropower were on average regarded as having a mitigating impact on climate change, whereas nuclear power was on average considered to have no mitigating impact. The findings are discussed in the context of public engagement with several of the suggested pathways, noting differences in perceptual patterns across samples

Climate change · Energy transition · Geography · German · Norwegian · Nuclear power · Perception · Wind power · Chemistry · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Environmental Education and Sustainability · Psychology · Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy · Social Psychology · Ecology

  • Hydrogen innovation and just transitions

    Open Access•Matthew Cotton, Christopher L Cooper et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2025

  • Navigating the energy transition

    Open Access•K L van den Broek, L de Jager et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2026

  • Mapping mental models in sustainability transitions

    Open Access•Karlijn L Van Den Broek, Simona O Negro et al.•Environmental Innovation and…•2024

  • Thin Plate Regression Splines

    Open Access•Simon N Wood•Journal of the Royal Statistical…•2003

  • The household energy gap

    Open Access•Stewart Barr, Andrew W Gilg et al.•Energy Policy•2005

  • Values, Perceived Risks and Benefits, and Acceptability of Nuclear Energy

    Open Access•Judith I M De Groot, Linda Steg et al.•Risk Analysis•2013

  • The Significance of Hedonic Values for Environmentally Relevant Attitudes, Preferences, and Actions

    Open Access•Linda Steg, Goda Perlaviciute et al.•Environment and Behavior•2014

  • Value Orientations to Explain Beliefs Related to Environmental Significant Behavior

    Open Access•Judith I M De Groot, Linda Steg•Environment and Behavior•2008

  • Factors influencing the acceptability of energy policies

    Open Access•Linda Steg, Lieke Dreijerink et al.•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2005

  • Understanding the human dimensions of a sustainable energy transition

    Open Access•Linda Steg, Goda Perlaviciute et al.•Frontiers in Psychology•2015

  • Contextual and psychological factors shaping evaluations and acceptability of energy alternatives

    Goda Perlaviciute, Linda Steg•Renewable and Sustainable Energy…•2014

  • Behavioural spillover in the environmental domain

    Open Access•Pietro Lanzini, John Thøgersen•Journal of Environmental Psychology•2014

  • Disclosing Citizens’ Perceptual Patterns of the Transition to Renewable Energy in Germany

    Marco Sonnberger, Michael Ruddat•Nature and Culture•2018

  • The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems

    Open Access•Ellen van der Werff, Linda Steg•Energy Research & Social Science•2016

  • Acceptance of energy transitions and policies

    Open Access•Christina Demski, Gareth Thomas et al.•Energy Research & Social Science•2018

  • Causal thinking and support for climate change policies

    Open Access•Ann Bostrom, Robert E O’connor et al.•Global Environmental Change•2011

  • Public values for energy system change

    Open Access•Christina Demski, Catherine Butler et al.•Global Environmental Change•2015

  • Does effective climate policy require well-informed citizen support

    Open Access•Ekaterina Rhodes, Jonn Axsen et al.•Global Environmental Change•2014

  • Local and socio-political acceptance of wind farms in Germany

    Open Access•Marco Sonnberger, Michael Ruddat•Technology in Society•2017

  • Are There Universal Aspects in the Structure and Contents of Human Values

    Open Access•Shalom H Schwartz•Journal of Social Issues•1994

  • An agenda for sustainability transitions research

    Open Access•Jonathan Köhler, Frank W Geels et al.•Environmental Innovation and…•2019

  • Acceptance and Support of the Australian Carbon Policy

    Open Access•Stacia J Dreyer, Iain Walker•Social Justice Research•2013

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae