Remote delivered cognitive rehabilitation programs in Acquired Brain Injury

A systematic review of methods and outcomes

Bibliographic Data

ID21627842
AuthorsJoana CÂMARA (0000-0002-4330-7702), Andreia Geraldo (0000-0002-5394-4588), Manuela Vilar (0000-0001-5245-7000), Eduardo Fermé (0000-0002-9618-2421)
Year2024
Volume43
Issue41
Pages31990-32026
Publication date2024-11-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCurrent Psychology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1046-1310 • E-ISSN: 1936-4733
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s12144-024-06526-z
LanguageEN
References cited59

Remote delivered cognitive rehabilitation programs (r-CRP) are increasingly recognized as alternative and complementary intervention approaches to traditional cognitive rehabilitation (CR) in the context of several neurological conditions, including acquired brain injuries (ABI). This systematic review examines the methodological characteristics of currently available r-CRP for ABI patients and investigates their impact on cognitive and noncognitive outcomes. A systematic search was performed on EBSCOhost, PubMed, and Web of Science, complemented by a manual search. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and the Cochrane Collaboration Guidelines were followed. Out of 1624 studies, a total of 19 studies were included. The results demonstrate that most r-CRP were administered to middle-aged community-dwelling chronic stroke survivors and that there was no consensus regarding assessment and intervention protocols. Moreover, most r-CRP were delivered through information and communication technologies (ICTs), primarily relying on cognitive training (CT) interventions addressing multiple cognitive domains (e.g., attention, memory). These ICT-based CT programs included tasks with low ecological validity, i.e., tasks with limited real-world application (e.g., cancelation tasks with artificial stimuli), and were asynchronous, meaning that participants performed the sessions at their own pace, without real-time monitoring from a therapist. In terms of the impact of r-CRP, class I studies reported mixed and inconsistent results regarding the effect of this mode of delivery on cognitive and noncognitive outcomes of ABI patients while supporting its high feasibility and acceptability among patients. Specific recommendations for future research are provided to improve the methodological quality of clinical studies and establish the evidence base for r-CRP

Tools

Open DOI