Examining the implementation of academic vocabulary, lexical density, and speech rate features on OpenCourseWare and Mooc lectures
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21632032 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chen-Yu Liu (0000-0002-4693-5667, English Language Center, Ming Chuan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 4924-4939 |
| Publication date | 2023-11-17 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Interactive Learning Environments (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1049-4820 • E-ISSN: 1744-5191 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10494820.2021.1987274 |
| OpenAlex | W3206070753 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 23 |
OpenCourseWare (OCW) and Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have gained increasing popularity and importance because they greatly expand students’ access to university lectures. Although the main component of OCW and MOOC platforms is lectures, their differences may potentially affect the difficulty of academic listening comprehension. This study thus explores the extent to which the differences between OCW and MOOC lectures may affect L2 academic listening comprehension in terms of three affecting factors: academic vocabulary coverage, lexical density, and speech rate. The result shows that both OCW and MOOC lectures have a high academic vocabulary coverage, with many more higher-level academic words appearing in the current MOOC lectures. Moreover, the lexical density and speech rate of MOOC lectures are significantly higher than those of OCW lectures, suggesting that students may need to process denser information delivered at a faster speech rate when viewing MOOC lectures. It is thus concluded that comprehending MOOC lectures may demand higher-level academic listening skills and a larger academic vocabulary size. The findings can provide implications for EAP instruction in terms of using OCW and MOOC lectures as academic listening materials for students with different academic vocabulary knowledge and listening proficiency levels
Academic year · Active listening · Linguistics · Mathematics education · Popularity · Vocabulary · Computer Science · Educational Technology and Assessment · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology · Text Readability and Simplification
A corpus-based study of vocabulary in massive open online courses (Moocs)
Suitability of TED-Ed animations for academic listening
Are TED Talks Suitable Materials for Humanities Specialized Vocabulary Learning
Enhancing the English Translation of Chinese Classics Through the Ratio of English Words to Chinese Characters
Vocabulary Demands of Open Access Academia
The lexical profile of academic spoken English
Lexical Coverage in L1 and L2 Listening Comprehension
What speaking rates do non-native listeners prefer?
Speech Rates in British English
The OpenCourseWare lecture
Self-directed learning in Moocs
A comparative analysis of speech rate and perception in radio bulletins
Speech Rate and NNS Comprehension
The Academic Spoken Word List
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |