Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Analysis of factors influencing students’ adoption of generative AI as a programming learning resource

Bibliographic Data

ID21632893
AuthorsTheresiawati Theresiawati (Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta, corresponding author), Achmad Nizar Hidayanto (0000-0002-5793-9460, University of Indonesia), Henki Bayu Seta (0000-0001-9771-3792, Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta), Anindya Maulida Widyatmoko (University of Indonesia), Masabil Arraya Muhammad (University of Indonesia), Muhammad Fawwa Arshad Said (University of Indonesia), Shafir Ramadhina Adifai (University of Indonesia)
Year2026
Volume34
Issue4
Pages2513-2530
Publication date2026-04-21
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInteractive Learning Environments (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1049-4820 • E-ISSN: 1744-5191
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10494820.2025.2546630
OpenAlexW7128217944
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited71

Generative AI has the potential to serve as a valuable learning resource in programming education by offering individualized learning experiences, self-directed learning support, and automatic feedback. However, research on the factors influencing its adoption in programming education in students’ perspectives is scarce. Thus, this study investigates the factors that motivate students to utilize generative AI as a programming learning tool. The focus is on how technophilia and perceived intelligence affect how students think about and use technology. We conducted a survey involving 410 respondents and analyzed the data using SmartPLS and structural equation modeling (SEM). The findings show that both technophilia and perceived intelligence have a significant impact on perceived usefulness, ease of use, trust, and enjoyment, all of which have an indirect effect on adoption intention. Furthermore, perceived usefulness, enjoyment, and trust significantly impact students’ intention to use generative AI in programming learning, while perceived ease of use lacks this impact. These findings offer significant insights for generative AI developers and policymakers seeking to improve the intelligence and usability of generative AI in programming education. This study advances AI-driven programming education by providing a deeper understanding of students’ adoption behaviors, resulting in more effective and engaging learning environments

Educational technology · Electronic learning · Generative grammar · Generative model · AI in Service Interactions · Diverse Interdisciplinary Research Innovations · Teaching and Learning Programming

  • Identifying key components and stakeholders for generative AI governance in higher education

    Okky Putra Barus, Achmad Nizar Hidayanto et al.•Interactive Learning Environments•2025

  • Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) Using R

    Open Access•Joseph F Hair, G Tomas M Hult et al.•Partial Least Squares Structural…•2021

  • Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence

    Open Access•Davinder Kaur, Suleyman Uslu et al.•ACM Computing Surveys•2023

  • Adoption and use of AI tools

    Open Access•Vivek Venkatesh, Viswanath Venkatesh•Annals of Operations Research•2022

  • Artificial Intelligence in Education

    Open Access•Lijia Chen, Pingping Chen et al.•IEEE Access•2020

  • AI technologies for education

    Open Access•Ke Zhang, Ayşe Aslan et al.•Computers and Education:…•2021

  • Transparency and trust in artificial intelligence systems

    Philipp Schmidt, Felix Biessmann et al.•Journal of Decision Systems•2020

  • Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence

    Ella Glikson, Anita Williams Woolley•Academy of Management Annals•2020

  • Developing and Validating Trust Measures for e-Commerce

    D Harrison McKnight, Vivek Choudhury et al.•Information Systems Research•2002

  • Reporting reliability, convergent and discriminant validity with structural equation modeling

    Open Access•Gordon W Cheung, Helena D Cooper–Thomas et al.•Asia Pacific Journal of Management•2024

  • Technology‐mediated learning theory

    Open Access•Matt Bower•British Journal of Educational…•2019

  • Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologies

    Hyesun Choung, Prabu David et al.•International Journal of…•2023

  • Antecedents of Trust and Adoption Intention toward Artificially Intelligent Recommendation Systems in Travel Planning

    Open Access•Si Shi, Yuhuang Gong et al.•Travel Research Bulletin•2021

  • Consumer evaluations of new technology-based self-service options

    Open Access•Pratibha A Dabholkar•International Journal of Research…•1996

  • “Extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Predict University Students’ Intentions to Use Metaverse-Based Learning Platforms”

    Open Access•Ahmad Samed Al-Adwan, Na Li et al.•Education and Information…•2023

  • Education in the Era of Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI)

    Open Access•David Baidoo-Anu, Leticia OWUSU ANSAH•Journal of AI•2023

  • Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective

    Open Access•Richard M Ryan, Edward L Deci•Contemporary Educational Psychology•2020

  • A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model

    Open Access•Vivek Venkatesh, Viswanath Venkatesh et al.•Management Science•2000

  • Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology

    Fred D Davis•MIS Quarterly•1989

  • What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature

    Open Access•Chung Kwan Lo•Education Sciences•2023

  • The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance

    Open Access•Doh Shin•International Journal of…•2021

  • The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education

    Ibrahim Adeshola, Adeola Praise Adepoju•Interactive Learning Environments•2024

  • Chat-GPT; validating Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in education sector via ubiquitous learning mechanism

    Open Access•Naveed Saif, Sajid Ullah Khan et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2024

  • Human confidence in artificial intelligence and in themselves

    Open Access•Leah Chong, Guanglu Zhang et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2022

  • Do background characteristics matter in Children's mastery of digital literacy? A cognitive diagnosis model analysis

    Open Access•Qianru Liang, Jimmy de la Torre et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • I, Chatbot

    Open Access•Muhammad Ashfaq, Jiang Yun et al.•Telematics and Informatics•2020

  • Fostering students' AI literacy development through educational games

    Open Access•Davy Tsz Kit Ng, Chen Xinyu et al.•Journal of Computer Assisted…•2024

  • Fear of AI

    Open Access•Federico Cugurullo, Ransford A Acheampong•AI & Society•2024

  • In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Theo Araujo, Natali Helberger et al.•AI & Society•2020

  • Examining students’ intention to use ChatGPT

    Open Access•Md Shahinur Rahman, Md Mahiuddin Sabbir et al.•Australasian Journal of…•2023

  • Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – where are the educators

    Open Access•Olaf Zawacki-Richter, Victoria I Marín et al.•International Journal of…•2019

  • Effect of Chat GPT on the digitized learning process of university students

    Alejandro Guadalupe Rincón Castillo, Giovanna Jackeline Serna Silva et al.•Journal of Namibian Studies…•2023

  • Service transformation under industry 4.0

    Open Access•Yongping Zhong, Segu Oh et al.•Technology in Society•2021

  • Auditing the AI auditors

    Open Access•Richard N Landers, Tara S Behrend•American Psychologist•2022

Citations per year1
Citation span2025 - 2025 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae