Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bringing Institutions Into the Opportunity Hoarding Debate

Bibliographic Data

ID21633549
AuthorsCasey J Dawkins (0000-0002-2627-8137, Department of Urban Studies and Planning, National Center for Smart Growth, School of Architecture, Planning & Preservation, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume33
Issue4
Pages793-796
Publication date2023-07-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHousing Policy Debate (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1051-1482 • E-ISSN: 2152-050X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10511482.2023.2173981
OpenAlexW4320727083
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited8

David Imbroscio’s “Beyond Opportunity Hoarding: Interrogating its Limits as an Account of Urban Inequalities” takes issue with the recent scholarly attention given to the concept of opportunity hoarding. Imbroscio worries that opportunity hoarding accounts of metropolitan inequalities place too much emphasis on the role of education and unequal patterns of consumption while ignoring the growing weakness of labor power vis-à-vis capital and the extreme concentration of capital ownership at the top of the wealth distribution. In this comment, I argue that Imbroscio downplays the importance of the institutions that generate metropolitan inequalities in the US. Imbroscio dismisses the two institutional processes that contribute to opportunity hoarding (barriers to the entry of people and the exit of resources) without providing a complete account of how the institutions of homeownership and fiscal decentralization work together to erect barriers to entry and exit. To dismiss entry and exit as solutions to opportunity hoarding without assigning blame to the institutions that stand in the way is to miss the forest for the trees

Blame · Decentralization · Economic growth · Economics · Human capital · Inequality · Market economy · Metropolitan area · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Income, Poverty, and Inequality · Psychology · Social Psychology · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies

  • No direction home

    Open Access•David Imbroscio•Dialogues in Urban Research•2025

  • Segregated by whom? Examining triple neighbourhood disadvantages and activity spaces in Seoul, South Korea

    Open Access•Geon Kim, Seungbeom Kang•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2024

  • Toward a New Project for Equality and Justice—In Housing, and Beyond

    David Imbroscio•Housing Policy Debate•2023

  • The truly disadvantaged

    William J Wilson•The truly disadvantaged•1990

  • The Homevoter Hypothesis

    William A Fischel•Homevoter Hypothesis•2009

  • The Impacts of Neighborhoods on Intergenerational Mobility I

    Open Access•Raj Chetty, Nathaniel Hendren•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•2018

  • Does Your Home Make You Wealthy

    Open Access•Alexandra Killewald, Brielle Bryan•RSF The Russell Sage Foundation…•2016

  • Racial prejudice and racial residential segregation in an urban model

    Open Access•John Yinger•Journal of Urban Economics•1976

  • The Rise and Decline of the American Ghetto

    Donald Cutler, David M Cutler et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1999

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2025 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae