Community of Practice Enhances Understanding, Interest, and Commitment to Promoting Character Development in Camp Counselor-in-Training Programs
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21634477 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Allison B Dymnicki (0000-0002-1167-5885, corresponding author), Allison Dymnicki (0009-0007-3195-309X, Abt Global (United States)), Robert P Warner (0000-0001-9423-7882, Delta Consulting Group), Ann Gillard (0000-0003-4050-0096, SeriousFun Network), Laurie B Pearson (American Camp Association, Martinsville, IN, USA), Taylor Wycoff (Delta Consulting Group) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 192-215 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Experiential Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1053-8259 • E-ISSN: 2169-009X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/10538259251385468 |
| OpenAlex | W4415220647 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 26 |
Background: Communities of practice (CoPs) create a “shared practice” through engaging in joint activities, information exchange, and mutual support around a common purpose. Few studies have assessed CoPs in experiential learning contexts such as camps. Purpose: In this instrumental case study, we examined the process and outcomes of a CoP initiative aimed at enhancing character development in medical specialty camp counselors-in-training programming. Method: Over two years, we recruited professionals from 12 camps to attend meetings, identify and define context-specific character strengths important for camp professionals, and collaboratively develop a toolkit to implement those character strengths in counselors-in-training. We assessed the implementation and effectiveness of the CoP to achieve project goals through facilitator notes, meeting recordings, researcher observations, surveys, and focus group data. Findings/Implications: CoPs can facilitate knowledge exchange, foster collaboration, and enhance character development efforts in camp counselors-in-training programming when supported by structured, ongoing engagement, especially of new CoP members. Key outcomes included an increased understanding of character strengths; greater interest in promoting character; and a stronger commitment to incorporating character in camp. Future research should collect more systematic quantitative and qualitative data about CoPs and their target outcomes to understand types and size of impacts resulting from this strategy
Character development · Coaching · Community of practice · Experiential learning · Facilitator · Focus group · Qualitative property · Child Therapy and Development · Diverse Education Studies and Reforms · Youth Development and Social Support
Communities of Practice
Evolution of Wenger's concept of community of practice
Can I use TA? Should I use TA? Should I not use TA? Comparing reflexive thematic analysis and other pattern‐based qualitative analytic approaches
The art of case study research
A Prospective Evaluation of the Effects of Outdoor Adventure Training Programs on Work-Related Outcomes
Fourth-Generation Evaluation
Six Key Elements Identified in an Active and Thriving Blended Community of Practice
One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis
Similarities and differences in summer camps
Fostering distinct and transferable learning via summer camp
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Summer Camp Experiences
| Highly cited | No |
|---|