Direct and indirect data-driven learning
An experimental study of that-complementation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21636256 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kar Kee Ann Yeung (0009-0004-1264-5663, Yulin University), G Hu (0000-0002-2297-4784, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 72 |
| Pages | 101301 |
| Publication date | 2026-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Second Language Writing (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1060-3743 • E-ISSN: 1873-1422 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jslw.2026.101301 |
| OpenAlex | W7148702175 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 41 |
While previous studies have demonstrated the pedagogical utility of data-driven learning (DDL), little research has compared direct (computer-based) and indirect (paper-based) DDL in English-as-a-second-language writing instruction. To address this gap, this study examined the effectiveness of the two DDL approaches in improving first-year college students’ knowledge and use of that -clauses in an English-for-academic-purposes course. Using a pre-post-delayed quasi-experimental design, two experimental groups received either direct or indirect DDL interventions, while a control group received traditional teacher-fronted instruction. Both DDL interventions led to short-term gains in the frequency of that -clause use. While the indirect DDL intervention was effective in sustaining such gains beyond the post-test, the gains for the direct DDL group disappeared on the delayed test. In terms of variety of use, only the direct DDL group showed improvement from the pre-test to the post-test and maintained this improvement on the delayed test. The direct DDL intervention was also somewhat more effective than the indirect DDL intervention in improving participants’ variety scores on the post-test. Finally, neither the direct nor the indirect DDL intervention had any significant effect on the accuracy with which that -clauses were used. Implications for second language writing instruction and future DDL research are discussed
Child and Animal Learning Development · Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning · Machine Learning and Algorithms
Hooking the reader
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
The Effects of Corpus Use on Second Language Vocabulary Learning
The Construction of Stance in Reporting Clauses
The Role of Consciousness in Second Language Learning1
DIY corpora for Accounting & Finance vocabulary learning
Promoting discipline-specific genre competence with corpus-based genre analysis activities
Concordancing in writing pedagogy and CAF measures of writing
Evaluative language in applied linguistics research article discussions
Evaluative that constructions
Adopting academic values
Nurturing hedges in the ESP curriculum
Is there any measurable learning from hands-on concordancing
The effect of hands-on and hands-off data-driven learning on low-intermediate learners’ verb-preposition collocations
Using Social‐psychological Variables to Predict The Use of Language Learning Strategies
How Big Is "Big"? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research
Corpus Use in Language Learning
The Socio-Educational Model of Second-Language Learning
Effectiveness of L2 Instruction
| Highly cited | No |
|---|