Regensburg 1–4 and the Catholic Tradition
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21637178 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Root (0009-0004-0126-0557, The Catholic University of America, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue | 1-2 |
| Pages | 72-90 |
| Publication date | 2024-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Pro Ecclesia A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1063-8512 • E-ISSN: 2631-8334 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/10638512251329022 |
| OpenAlex | W4408834984 |
| Language | EN |
The opening four articles of the Regensburg Colloquy are here compared with the treatment of the same topics by the Council of Trent’s Decrees on Original Sin and on Justification and by the Catholic–Lutheran Joint Declaration on the Doctrine of Justification. Attention is paid to the way each of the three texts were written to play specific ecclesiastical functions, which shaped the kind of agreements sought in each text. A broad similarity is noted in the understanding of original sin and concupiscence held by the texts, despite different approaches to detailed questions about concupiscence
Sociology · Philosophy · Reformation and Early Modern Christianity
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |