Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Comparative Analysis of Hillary Clinton and John Mahama’s Concession Speeches in the 2016 US and Ghanaian Presidential Elections

Bibliographic Data

ID21637342
AuthorsGodwin Etse Sikanku (0000-0001-7682-7651, Journalism & Media Studies, Ghana Institute of Journalism, Accra, Ghana), Nana Kwame Osei Fordjour (0000-0002-0598-3646, Communication and Journalism, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA, corresponding author), Eric Opoku Mensah (0000-0002-4178-6615, Ghana Institute of Journalism, Accra, Ghana), Kwamena Kwansah-Aidoo (Ghana Institute of Journalism, Accra, Ghana)
Year2023
Volume34
Issue1
Pages76-91
Publication date2023-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueHoward Journal of Communications (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1064-6175 • E-ISSN: 1096-4649
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10646175.2022.2090877
OpenAlexW4293058817
LanguageEN
Citations received7
References cited21

Comparative research contributes to knowledge by providing a better understanding of how a phenomenon manifests in different socio-cultural contexts. In this present study, we examined the concession speeches of Hillary Clinton (United States, Democratic Party) and John Mahama (Ghana, National Democratic Congress, NDC) in the aftermath of their 2016 electoral defeats. Findings indicated that three similar frames emerged between the two candidates. Hillary Clinton’s frames included: acknowledging pain and acceptance, democracy, values and nationalism, and gratitude. John Mahama’s frames had: acceptance and concern, appreciation, unity, democracy, and nationhood. Both candidates accepted the electoral outcome, showed gratitude, and reaffirmed their belief in democracy and unity. However, there were slight differences. Hillary Clinton’s frame on acknowledging pain and acceptance had a more open, forthright recognition of being hurt in a way that enabled her to process the loss and pain. Findings from this study provide insights into recent concession speeches across two socio-cultural and continental divides, which builds on literature in framing and political communication

Democracy · Gratitude · Media studies · Nationalism · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Sociology · History · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

  • Image Creation about Africa Within the State-Owned Media Space

    Open Access•Kwaku Baah-Acheamfour•E-Journal of Humanities Arts and…•2024

  • The Continuous Negative Framing of Africa in the Media

    Open Access•Kwaku Baah-Acheamfour, Judith Lamptey-George•E-Journal of Humanities Arts and…•2024

  • Image of the Christian Clergy in the Ghanaian Media

    Open Access•Kwaku Baah-Acheamfour, Judith Lamptey-George et al.•E-Journal of Humanities Arts and…•2025

  • The Obama creed in retrospect

    Open Access•Godwin Etse Sikanku•Communication and the Public•2023

  • Presidential discourse, the public and recurring themes

    Open Access•Godwin Etse Sikanku•Communication and the Public•2022

  • The emotional labour of concession

    John Ganaah, Rachel Thompson et al.•Social Semiotics•2026

  • Press Releases, Politics, and Gendered Language Frames

    Open Access•Nana Kwame Osei Fordjour•Journal of Communication Inquiry•2026

  • The International Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods

    Open Access•Jörg Matthes, Christine S Davis et al.•International Encyclopedia of…•2017

  • Title unavailable

    Open Access•null null•Philosophy study•2016

  • A Multimodal Social Semiotic Analysis of an African Vice President on Twitter

    Nana Kwame Osei Fordjour•Visual Communication Quarterly•2021

  • Fantasy Themes, Symbolic Power, and Twitter

    Nana Kwame Osei Fordjour•Howard Journal of Communications•2022

  • “Godsplaining”

    Open Access•Wincharles Coker•Journal of Black Studies•2021

  • A possessive investment in white heteropatriarchy? The 2016 election and the politics of race, gender, and sexuality

    Dara Z Strolovitch, Janelle Wong et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2017

  • Gendered styles, gendered differences

    Lori Meeks•Journal of Information Technology…•2016

  • Fashionable (dis-)order in politics

    Eva Flicker•International Journal of Media…•2013

  • Clothing semiotics and the social construction of power relations

    Yuet See Monica Owyong•Social Semiotics•2009

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Thomas J Wood, Thomas Wood et al.•Electoral Studies•2019

  • Finding Her Voice

    Michelle C Bligh, Michelle Bligh et al.•Women s Studies•2010

  • The Neglect of Power in Recent Framing Research

    Open Access•Kevin M Carragee, Wim Roefs•Journal of Communication•2004

  • Framing analysis

    Zhongdang Pan, Gerald M Kosicki et al.•Political Communication•1993

  • Talk “Like a Man

    Open Access•Jennifer Jones, Jennifer J Jones•Perspectives on Politics•2016

  • Ghana's elections of 7 December 2016

    Joseph R A Ayee, Joseph Ra Ayee•South African Journal of…•2017

  • Race, Gender, and Nation in 'The Color Purple

    Lauren Berlant•Critical Inquiry•1988

  • Media Discourse and Public Opinion on Nuclear Power

    William A Gamson, Andre Modigliani•American Journal of Sociology•1989

Unique citing works7
Citations per year1,75
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 7

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae