Limitations of Current Menstrual Equity Advocacy and a Path Towards Justice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21640138 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Allyson Crays (0000-0002-5057-6580, Baldwin Wallace University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 30 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-14 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | UCLA Women s Law Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1068-9893 • E-ISSN: 1943-1708 |
| Publisher | California Digital Library (CDL) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5070/l330161547 |
| OpenAlex | W4384283050 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 2 |
Since 2015, legal strategies to end period poverty and achieve menstrual equity have increased dramatically across the United States. Current advocacy for menstrual equity is concentrated in three main areas: litigation based on sex discrimination claims, legislation to end additional taxes on menstrual products, and legislation to increase access to menstrual products in schools. This Article outlines and analyzes the history of menstrual equity activism in litigation and legislative initiatives to understand the progress that advocates have achieved. This Article then argues that the framework of sex discrimination limits current menstrual equity legal strategies and, therefore, lawyers and activists should adopt are productive justice lens to meet the needs of the most marginalized menstruators. Lastly, this Article argues that to advocate for true menstrual justice, advocates should shift their attention and resources to administrative and policy changes that would work to eliminate period poverty for the people most in need, such as low-income, unhoused, and incarcerated menstruators
Economic growth · Economics · Gender equity · Legislation · Legislature · Political science · Poverty · Feminist Theory and Gender Studies · Law · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies · Public Administration
| Highly cited | No |
|---|